This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 4:31 PM, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wrote: >> Hi Jason, >> >> On 17/01/2018 00:04, Jason Merrill wrote: >>> >>> Like my recent patch for 83186, we were missing a >>> build_non_dependent_expr. >>> >>> Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk. >> >> Lately I'm seeing (H.J. Lu too) a regression: >> >> FAIL: g++.dg/template/inherit4.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors) >> FAIL: g++.dg/template/inherit4.C -std=c++14 (test for excess errors) >> >> which seems related to this change of yours: if I comment out the new >> build_non_dependent_expr call the test is accepted again. Could you please >> have a look? > > Hmm, wonder why I didn't see that in my testing. Checking a fix now. We were failing to treat A::foo_ as an instantiation-dependent SCOPE_REF, which it is because of the dependent base B<T>. Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
Attachment:
inh4.diff
Description: Text document
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |