This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Bump minimum value for max-sched-ready-insns param to 1 (PR rtl-optimization/86620)


On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:04 PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This param allows minimum of 0, which doesn't make much sense.
> On the i386/pr83620.c test (when used with the =0 value) we ICE
> because ix86_adjust_priority which has code to prevent moving of likely
> spilled hard regs doesn't have a chance to do anything, since we don't
> consider any other insns as ready.
>
> This patch bumps the minimum to 1, so that there is at least something
> considered.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

Ok.

Richard.

> 2018-01-15  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
>
>         PR rtl-optimization/86620
>         * params.def (max-sched-ready-insns): Bump minimum value to 1.
>
>         * gcc.dg/pr64935-2.c: Use --param=max-sched-ready-insns=1
>         instead of --param=max-sched-ready-insns=0.
>         * gcc.target/i386/pr83620.c: New test.
>         * gcc.dg/pr83620.c: New test.
>
> --- gcc/params.def.jj   2018-01-14 17:16:57.471836055 +0100
> +++ gcc/params.def      2018-01-15 18:53:24.122124325 +0100
> @@ -744,7 +744,7 @@ DEFPARAM (PARAM_MAX_FIELDS_FOR_FIELD_SEN
>  DEFPARAM(PARAM_MAX_SCHED_READY_INSNS,
>          "max-sched-ready-insns",
>          "The maximum number of instructions ready to be issued to be considered by the scheduler during the first scheduling pass.",
> -        100, 0, 0)
> +        100, 1, 0)
>
>  /* This is the maximum number of active local stores RTL DSE will consider.  */
>  DEFPARAM (PARAM_MAX_DSE_ACTIVE_LOCAL_STORES,
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr64935-2.c.jj 2017-06-19 08:27:46.126467108 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr64935-2.c    2018-01-15 18:52:23.987124863 +0100
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  /* PR rtl-optimization/64935 */
>  /* { dg-do compile } */
> -/* { dg-options "-O -fschedule-insns --param=max-sched-ready-insns=0 -fcompare-debug" } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O -fschedule-insns --param=max-sched-ready-insns=1 -fcompare-debug" } */
>  /* { dg-require-effective-target scheduling } */
>  /* { dg-xfail-if "" { powerpc-ibm-aix* } } */
>
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr83620.c.jj  2018-01-15 18:53:43.267124153 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr83620.c     2018-01-15 19:17:31.053208498 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +/* PR rtl-optimization/86620 */
> +/* { dg-do compile { target int128 } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -flive-range-shrinkage --param=max-sched-ready-insns=1 -Wno-psabi -mno-avx" } */
> +
> +typedef unsigned __int128 V __attribute__ ((vector_size (64)));
> +
> +V u, v;
> +
> +V
> +foo (char c, short d, int e, long f, __int128 g)
> +{
> +  f >>= c & 63;
> +  v = (V){f} == u;
> +  return e + g + v;
> +}
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr83620.c.jj   2018-01-15 19:16:31.953190203 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr83620.c      2018-01-15 19:16:16.499185414 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +/* PR rtl-optimization/86620 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -flive-range-shrinkage --param=max-sched-ready-insns=0" } */
> +/* { dg-error "minimum value of parameter 'max-sched-ready-insns' is 1" "" { target *-*-* } 0 } */
> +
> +void
> +foo (void)
> +{
> +}
>
>         Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]