This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix vector handling in simplify-rtx.c (PR rtl-optimization/82973)


On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:12:14AM +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:
> > Hi!
> >
> > In rtl.texi we say:
> > @findex const_vector
> > @item (const_vector:@var{m} [@var{x0} @var{x1} @dots{}])
> > Represents a vector constant.  The square brackets stand for the vector
> > containing the constant elements.  @var{x0}, @var{x1} and so on are
> > the @code{const_int}, @code{const_wide_int}, @code{const_double} or
> > @code{const_fixed} elements.
> > and it is a very reasonable requirement. 
> > simplify_const_{unary,binary}_operation can violate that though, because
> > the recursion can return also other expressions, like in this case
> > a (mult (const_double) (const_double)) that can't be simplified because
> > of -frounding-math.  We need to punt on those.
> >
> > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
> 
> How about renaming valid_for_const_vec_duplicate_p to something more
> generic and using it here too?  The requirements should be the same.

As it generates CONST_VECTOR, renaming it to valid_for_const_vector_p
and using it also in simplify-rtx.c looks reasonable to me.

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]