This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 15/14] Use fold_for_warn in get_atomic_generic_size


On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 8:12 PM, David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com> wrote:
> I rebased the v2 patchkit; here's an extra patch to fix an issue
> with it uncovered by a recently-added testcase (in r254990).
>
> With the patch kit, but without this patch, g++'s
>   c-c++-common/pr83059.c
> fails to emit the "invalid memory model argument 6" warning.
>
> Successfully bootstrapped&regrtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, as
> part of the kit.
>
> Is this OK for trunk, assuming the rest of the kit is approved?
>
> gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
>         * c-common.c (get_atomic_generic_size): Call fold_for_warn on the
>         params before checking for INTEGER_CST.
> ---
>  gcc/c-family/c-common.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-common.c b/gcc/c-family/c-common.c
> index 3438b87..ab03b7d 100644
> --- a/gcc/c-family/c-common.c
> +++ b/gcc/c-family/c-common.c
> @@ -6720,7 +6720,7 @@ get_atomic_generic_size (location_t loc, tree function,
>    /* Check memory model parameters for validity.  */
>    for (x = n_param - n_model ; x < n_param; x++)
>      {
> -      tree p = (*params)[x];
> +      tree p = fold_for_warn ((*params)[x]);
>        if (TREE_CODE (p) == INTEGER_CST)
>          {
>           /* memmodel_base masks the low 16 bits, thus ignore any bits above

Let's check the error case before we call fold_for_warn.

Jason


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]