This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH libstdc++/66689] comp_ellint_3 and ellint_3 return garbage values
- From: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Christophe Lyon <christophe dot lyon at linaro dot org>, Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net>, "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:36:04 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH libstdc++/66689] comp_ellint_3 and ellint_3 return garbage values
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAGWvnymGWZr2Cnei_GmGRNc24L=AkYvVAiSNAe16_xBtQQ_ZbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKdteOYtMKdVJPCuCQLW2eB+X8P_WtiHfvXN9oryt31ewOeR8Q@mail.gmail.com> <20171120210154.GH31922@redhat.com> <20171120210747.GI31922@redhat.com> <20171120215136.GJ31922@redhat.com>
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 20/11/17 21:07 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> On 20/11/17 21:01 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20/11/17 21:43 +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 20 November 2017 at 17:02, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch has introduced new regressions on at least PowerPC and
>>>>> AArch64.
>>>>>
>>>>> FAIL: ext/special_functions/hyperg/check_value.cc execution test
>>>>> FAIL:
>>>>> tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/17_hyperg/check_value.cc
>>>>> execution test
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On AArch64 and ARM, I have also noticed
>>>> FAIL: special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc (test for excess
>>>> errors)
>>>> UNRESOLVED: special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc
>>>> compilation failed to produce executable
>>>> because:
>>>>
>>>> /libstdc++-v3/testsuite/special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc:
>>>> In function 'void test(const testcase_riemann_zeta<Ret> (&)[Num],
>>>> Ret)':
>>>>
>>>> /libstdc++-v3/testsuite/special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc:292:
>>>> error: 'riemann_zeta' is not a member of 'std'
>>>>
>>>> /libstdc++-v3/testsuite/special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc:292:
>>>> note: suggested alternative: 'remainder'
>>>> compiler exited with status 1
>>>
>>>
>>> The problem is that { dg-addition-options } was changed to dg-options,
>>> and so the first dg-options that enables the special functions is not
>>> used:
>>>
>>> ---
>>> a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc
>>> +++
>>> b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc
>>> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
>>> // riemann_zeta
>>>
>>> // This can take long on simulators, timing out the test.
>>> -// { dg-additional-options "-DMAX_ITERATIONS=5" { target simulator } }
>>> +// { dg-options "-DMAX_ITERATIONS=5" { target simulator } }
>>>
>>
>>
>> I have a script to check dejagnu directives, and it says:
>>
>>
>> testsuite/tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/20_riemann_zeta/check_value_neg.cc
>> has multiple dg-options directives
>> testsuite/ext/special_functions/airy_ai/check_nan.cc has dg-options after
>> dg-add-options
>> testsuite/ext/special_functions/hyperg/check_nan.cc has dg-options after
>> dg-add-options
>> testsuite/ext/special_functions/conf_hyperg/check_nan.cc has dg-options
>> after dg-add-options
>> testsuite/ext/special_functions/airy_bi/check_nan.cc has dg-options after
>> dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/02_assoc_legendre/check_nan.cc has dg-options
>> after dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/14_expint/check_nan.cc has dg-options after
>> dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/12_ellint_2/check_nan.cc has dg-options after
>> dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/09_cyl_bessel_k/check_nan.cc has dg-options
>> after dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/21_sph_neumann/check_nan.cc has dg-options
>> after dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/15_hermite/check_nan.cc has dg-options after
>> dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/19_sph_bessel/check_nan.cc has dg-options
>> after dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/05_comp_ellint_2/check_nan.cc has dg-options
>> after dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/11_ellint_1/check_nan.cc has dg-options after
>> dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/17_legendre/check_nan.cc has dg-options after
>> dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/10_cyl_neumann/check_nan.cc has dg-options
>> after dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/06_comp_ellint_3/check_nan.cc has dg-options
>> after dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/06_comp_ellint_3/pr66689.cc has dg-options
>> after dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/01_assoc_laguerre/check_nan.cc has dg-options
>> after dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/16_laguerre/check_nan.cc has dg-options after
>> dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/13_ellint_3/check_nan.cc has dg-options after
>> dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/13_ellint_3/pr66689.cc has dg-options after
>> dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/07_cyl_bessel_i/check_nan.cc has dg-options
>> after dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_nan.cc has dg-options
>> after dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc has multiple
>> dg-options directives
>> testsuite/special_functions/08_cyl_bessel_j/check_nan.cc has dg-options
>> after dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/04_comp_ellint_1/check_nan.cc has dg-options
>> after dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/03_beta/check_nan.cc has dg-options after
>> dg-add-options
>> testsuite/special_functions/20_sph_legendre/check_nan.cc has dg-options
>> after dg-add-options
>>
>> For now I'll just fix the multiple dg-options one causing the FAILs.
>
>
>
> I've committed this patch, which should help for Christophe's cases.
> It won't help the AIX execution FAILs.
Ed,
What is the progress with fixing the new execution fail regressinos
that were introduced with the patch?
Thanks, David