This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] remove cilk-plus
- From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>, "Koval, Julia" <julia dot koval at intel dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 08:43:10 -0700
- Subject: Re: [patch] remove cilk-plus
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <4E89A029A0F8D443B436A5167BA3C53F42AD12C2@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> <7a7b6ee1-469f-4e9a-00ba-300565c5de9d@oracle.com>
On 12/01/2017 03:28 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 16/11/2017 16:33, Koval, Julia wrote:
>> // I failed to send patch itself, it is too big even in gzipped form.
>> What is the right way to send such big patches?
>>
>> Hi, this patch removes cilkplus. Ok for trunk?
> Now that cilkplus is gone I suppose we should clean-up Bugzilla about
> that. Shall I go ahead and essentially close all the bugs we got? As
> WONTFIX or what else? Let's agree on something. In principle we could
> keep the regressions for the sake of the existing release branches but I
> think we got very, very, few of those and anyway I don't see who gonna
> work on that...
Not sure if we have a policy in this space or not.
If we don't then my vote would be for CLOSE/WONTFIX now. That seems to
most accurately reflect state -- we're not going to be fixing any Cilk+
stuff on the trunk or in the release branches.
jeff