This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR82991


On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 11:41:24AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> 
> I am testing the following (old) patch to value number call lhs
> according to the ERF_RETURNS_ARG annotation.  This allows for
> more expression simplification and also changes downstream
> users of the argument to use the return value which should help
> register allocation and register lifetime in general.

If the argument is an SSA_NAME then that is generally a win, but won't
it also replace if the argument is say ADDR_EXPR of a VAR_DECL or similar?

If we only later (say some later forwprop) determine the argument is
gimple_min_invariant, shouldn't we have something that will effectively
undo this (i.e. replace the uses of the function result with whatever
we've simplified the argument to)?

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]