This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH] Don't split call from its call arg location


When a port is using hardware loops (like ARC) makes use of
reorg_loops to find and analyze loops that end in loop_end
instructions. The very same function can be set to reorder the cfg
such that the loop end occurs after the loop start. This task is
performed by reorder_loops function which at its turn calls
cfg_layout_finalize -> fixup_reoreder_chain ->
force_nonfallthru_and_redirect (cfgrtl.c:1476).   However, the latter
is splitting a call and its corresponding CALL_ARG_LOCATION note,
leading to an assert in dwarf2out_var_location() at dwarf2out.c:26391.

Original post:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-11/msg00110.html

Ok to apply?
Claudiu

gcc/
2017-11-20  Claudiu Zissulescu  <claziss@synopsys.com>

	* cfgrtl.c (force_nonfallthru_and_redirect): Don't split a call
	and its corresponding call arg location note.
---
 gcc/cfgrtl.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/cfgrtl.c b/gcc/cfgrtl.c
index ae469088eec..d6e5ac05475 100644
--- a/gcc/cfgrtl.c
+++ b/gcc/cfgrtl.c
@@ -1626,6 +1626,11 @@ force_nonfallthru_and_redirect (edge e, basic_block target, rtx jump_label)
       else
 	new_head = BB_END (e->src);
       new_head = NEXT_INSN (new_head);
+      /* Make sure we don't split a call and its corresponding
+	 CALL_ARG_LOCATION note.  */
+      if (new_head && NOTE_P (new_head)
+	  && NOTE_KIND (new_head) == NOTE_INSN_CALL_ARG_LOCATION)
+	new_head = NEXT_INSN (new_head);
 
       jump_block = create_basic_block (new_head, NULL, e->src);
       jump_block->count = count;
-- 
2.14.3


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]