This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PING] Re: correct attribute ifunc C++ type safety (PR 82301)


Ping?

Since I submitted the updated patch it has been suggested to me
that providing a new option to control the warning rather than
using an existing one would be preferable (see bug 82435 for
the background).  The attached update to the patch adds
-Wattribute-alias for this purpose and restores the original
disposition for -Wincompatible-pointer-types.

Thanks
Martin

On 10/04/2017 01:40 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 09/28/2017 08:25 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 09/24/2017 06:03 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
r253041 enhanced type checking for alias and ifunc attributes to
detect declarations of incompatible aliases, or ifunc resolvers
that return pointers to functions of an incompatible type.  More
extensive testing exposed a bug in the implementation of the ifunc
attribute handling in C++ where the checker expected the ifunc
resolver to return a pointer to a member function when the
implementation actually expects it return a pointer to a non-
member function.

In a discussion of the test suite failures, Jakub also suggested
to break the enhanced warning out of -Wattributes and issue it
under a different option.

The attached patch corrects the C++ problem and moves the warning
under -Wincompatible-pointer-types.  Since this is a C-only option,
the patch also enables for it C++.  Since the option is enabled by
default, the patch further requires -Wextra to issue the warning
for ifunc resolvers returning void*.  However, the patched checker
diagnoses other incompatibilities without it.

Martin

I find the maybe_diag_incompatible_alias function confusing.

+/* Check declaration of the type of ALIAS for compatibility with its
TARGET
+   (which may be an ifunc resolver) and issue a diagnostic when they
are
+   not compatible according to language rules (plus a C++ extension for
+   non-static member functions).  */
+
+static void
+maybe_diag_incompatible_alias (tree alias, tree target)
+{
+  tree altype = TREE_TYPE (alias);
+  tree targtype = TREE_TYPE (target);
+
+  bool ifunc = lookup_attribute ("ifunc", DECL_ATTRIBUTES (alias));
+  if (ifunc)

I think it might be clearer if this was broken out into a diag_ifunc
function?  But see below ...

Thanks for the review.  I've updated the patch to incorporate
your suggestions.  My responses (mostly agreeing with your
comments or clarifying things, plus one question) are inline.


+    {
+      /* Handle attribute ifunc first.  */
+
+      tree funcptr = altype;
+
+      /* Set FUNCPTR to the type of the alias target.  If the type
+     is a non-static member function of class C, construct a type
+     of an ordinary function taking C* as the first argument,
+     followed by the member function argument list, and use it
+     instead to check for compatibilties.  FUNCPTR is used only
+     in diagnostics.  */

This comment is self-contradictory.
  1 Set FUNCPTR
  2 Do some method-type shenanigans
  3 Use it to check for incompatibilites
  4 FUNCPTR is only used in diags

Which of #3 and #4 is true?

Both.  It's used to control diagnostics (as opposed to something
else).  But the comment is from an earlier version of the patch
where the function body was still a part of its caller, so it's
redundant now that all the code in maybe_diag_incompatible_alias
is only used to control diagnostics.

+
+      if (TREE_CODE (altype) == METHOD_TYPE)
+    {

IMHO put the description of the METHOD_TYPE chicanery inside the block
doing it?  FWIW, although the change being made works on many (most?)
ABIs, it's not formally correct and I think fails on some where 'this'
is passed specially. You might want to note that?

Sure.  I've added a comment.

Since the original tests (where the resolver returns void*) pass
across the board I assume it must work for all supported ABIs.
Or is there some subtlety between the before and after code that
I'm missing?


+      tree rettype = TREE_TYPE (altype);
+      tree args = TYPE_ARG_TYPES (altype);
+      altype = build_function_type (rettype, args);
+      funcptr = altype;
+    }
+

+      if ((!FUNC_OR_METHOD_TYPE_P (targtype)
+           || (prototype_p (altype)
+           && prototype_p (targtype)
+           && !types_compatible_p (altype, targtype))))
+        {
+          funcptr = build_pointer_type (funcptr);
+
+          if (warning_at (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (target),
+                  OPT_Wincompatible_pointer_types,
+                  "%<ifunc%> resolver for %qD should return %qT",
+                  alias, funcptr))
+        inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (alias),
+            "resolver indirect function declared here");
+        }

this block is almost the same as the non-ifunc block.  Surely they can
be the same code? (by generalizing one of the cases until it turns into
the other?)

The existing code does that but in this patch I made the warnings
and informational notes distinct.  It feels like a tossup between
parameterizing the code and making the flow more complex and harder
to follow and keeping the two cases (ifunc and alias) separate from
one another.  But I don't feel strongly one way or the other so
I changed it as you suggest.

+      /* Deal with static member function pointers.  */

I do not understand this comment or condition. We seem to have dealt
with pointers already and the conditions seem confused.

+      if (TREE_CODE (targtype) != RECORD_TYPE
+          || TYPE_FIELDS (targtype)
+          || TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (TYPE_FIELDS (targtype))) !=
POINTER_TYPE
+          || (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (TYPE_FIELDS
(targtype))))
+          != METHOD_TYPE))

if
  not a record,
  or has TYPE_FIELDS non-NULL
  or the first field doesn't have pointer type (we can't get here)
  or something else about the first field

oh, I think it's trying to spot the pointer to NON-static member
function internal record type.  But brokenly. I think pmf record_types
have DECL_ARTIFICIAL and BUILTIN_LOCATION, that might be useful.

It turns out this code was superfluous with the C++ correction
and I was able to remove it with no impact on the tests.


+        {
+          funcptr = build_pointer_type (funcptr);
+
+          error ("%<ifunc%> resolver for %qD must return %qT",
+             alias, funcptr);
+
+          inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (alias),
+              "resolver indirect function declared here");
+        }
+    }
+

+  if ((!FUNC_OR_METHOD_TYPE_P (targtype)
+       || (prototype_p (altype)
+       && prototype_p (targtype)
+       && !types_compatible_p (altype, targtype))))

Similar to above, already noted.

Is this function called before we know whether we've enabled the
appropriate warnings?  It would be better to bail out sooner if the
warnings are disabled.

I'm not sure I understand the question or suggestion here but
warnings in general are certainly enabled at this point.  The
function issues both errors and warnings so it can't very well
exit early without checking the compatibility.  Let me know if
I misunderstood your comment.

Martin

PR c/82301 - Updated test case g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-1.C (and others) in r253041 segfault on powerpc64
PR c/82435 - new __attribute__((alias)) warning gets in the way

gcc/ChangeLog:

	PR other/82301
	PR c/82435
	* cgraphunit.c (maybe_diag_incompatible_alias): New function.
	(handle_alias_pairs): Call it.
	* common.opt (-Wattribute-alias): New option.
	* doc/extend.texi (ifunc attribute): Discuss C++ specifics.
	* doc/invoke.texi (-Wattribute-alias): Document.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	PR other/82301
	PR c/82435
	* g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-1.C: Update.
	* g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-2.C: Same.
	* g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-3.C: Same.
	* g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-4.C: Same.
	* g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-5.C: Same.
	* g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-6.C: New test.
	* g++.old-deja/g++.abi/vtable2.C: Update.
	* gcc.dg/attr-ifunc-6.c: New test.
	* gcc.dg/attr-ifunc-7.c: New test.
	* gcc.dg/pr81854.c: Update.
	* lib/target-supports.exp: Update.

diff --git a/gcc/cgraphunit.c b/gcc/cgraphunit.c
index 8c1acf7..4f68790 100644
--- a/gcc/cgraphunit.c
+++ b/gcc/cgraphunit.c
@@ -1296,6 +1296,93 @@ analyze_functions (bool first_time)
   input_location = saved_loc;
 }
 
+/* Check declaration of the type of ALIAS for compatibility with its TARGET
+   (which may be an ifunc resolver) and issue a diagnostic when they are
+   not compatible according to language rules (plus a C++ extension for
+   non-static member functions).  */
+
+static void
+maybe_diag_incompatible_alias (tree alias, tree target)
+{
+  tree altype = TREE_TYPE (alias);
+  tree targtype = TREE_TYPE (target);
+
+  bool ifunc = lookup_attribute ("ifunc", DECL_ATTRIBUTES (alias));
+  tree funcptr = altype;
+
+  if (ifunc)
+    {
+      /* Handle attribute ifunc first.  */
+      if (TREE_CODE (altype) == METHOD_TYPE)
+	{
+	  /* Set FUNCPTR to the type of the alias target.  If the type
+	     is a non-static member function of class C, construct a type
+	     of an ordinary function taking C* as the first argument,
+	     followed by the member function argument list, and use it
+	     instead to check for incompatibility.  This conversion is
+	     not defined by the language but an extension provided by
+	     G++.  */
+
+	  tree rettype = TREE_TYPE (altype);
+	  tree args = TYPE_ARG_TYPES (altype);
+	  altype = build_function_type (rettype, args);
+	  funcptr = altype;
+	}
+
+      targtype = TREE_TYPE (targtype);
+
+      if (POINTER_TYPE_P (targtype))
+	{
+	  targtype = TREE_TYPE (targtype);
+
+	  /* Only issue Wattribute-alias for conversions to void* with
+	     -Wextra.  */
+	  if (VOID_TYPE_P (targtype) && !extra_warnings)
+	    return;
+
+	  /* Proceed to handle incompatible ifunc resolvers below.  */
+	}
+      else
+	{
+	  funcptr = build_pointer_type (funcptr);
+
+	  error_at (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (target),
+		    "%<ifunc%> resolver for %qD must return %qT",
+		 alias, funcptr);
+	  inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (alias),
+		  "resolver indirect function declared here");
+	  return;
+	}
+    }
+
+  if ((!FUNC_OR_METHOD_TYPE_P (targtype)
+       || (prototype_p (altype)
+	   && prototype_p (targtype)
+	   && !types_compatible_p (altype, targtype))))
+    {
+      /* Warn for incompatibilities.  Avoid warning for functions
+	 without a prototype to make it possible to declare aliases
+	 without knowing the exact type, as libstdc++ does.  */
+      if (ifunc)
+	{
+	  funcptr = build_pointer_type (funcptr);
+
+	  if (warning_at (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (target),
+			  OPT_Wattribute_alias,
+			  "%<ifunc%> resolver for %qD should return %qT",
+			  alias, funcptr))
+	    inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (alias),
+		    "resolver indirect function declared here");
+	}
+      else if (warning_at (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (alias),
+			   OPT_Wattribute_alias,
+			   "%qD alias between functions of incompatible "
+			   "types %qT and %qT", alias, altype, targtype))
+	inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (target),
+		"aliased declaration here");
+    }
+}
+
 /* Translate the ugly representation of aliases as alias pairs into nice
    representation in callgraph.  We don't handle all cases yet,
    unfortunately.  */
@@ -1305,7 +1392,7 @@ handle_alias_pairs (void)
 {
   alias_pair *p;
   unsigned i;
-  
+
   for (i = 0; alias_pairs && alias_pairs->iterate (i, &p);)
     {
       symtab_node *target_node = symtab_node::get_for_asmname (p->target);
@@ -1352,65 +1439,7 @@ handle_alias_pairs (void)
       if (TREE_CODE (p->decl) == FUNCTION_DECL
           && target_node && is_a <cgraph_node *> (target_node))
 	{
-	  tree t1 = TREE_TYPE (p->decl);
-	  tree t2 = TREE_TYPE (target_node->decl);
-
-	  if (lookup_attribute ("ifunc", DECL_ATTRIBUTES (p->decl)))
-	    {
-	      t2 = TREE_TYPE (t2);
-	      if (POINTER_TYPE_P (t2))
-		{
-		  t2 = TREE_TYPE (t2);
-		  if (!FUNC_OR_METHOD_TYPE_P (t2))
-		    {
-		      if (warning_at (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (p->decl),
-				      OPT_Wattributes,
-				      "%q+D %<ifunc%> resolver should return "
-				      "a function pointer",
-				      p->decl))
-			inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (target_node->decl),
-				"resolver declaration here");
-
-		      t2 = NULL_TREE;
-		    }
-		}
-	      else
-		{
-		  /* Deal with static member function pointers.  */
-		  if (TREE_CODE (t2) == RECORD_TYPE
-		      && TYPE_FIELDS (t2)
-		      && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (TYPE_FIELDS (t2))) == POINTER_TYPE
-		      && (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (TYPE_FIELDS (t2))))
-			  == METHOD_TYPE))
-		    t2 = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (TYPE_FIELDS (t2)));
-		  else
-		    {
-		      error ("%q+D %<ifunc%> resolver must return a function "
-			     "pointer",
-			     p->decl);
-		      inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (target_node->decl),
-			      "resolver declaration here");
-
-		      t2 = NULL_TREE;
-		    }
-		}
-	    }
-
-	  if (t2
-	      && (!FUNC_OR_METHOD_TYPE_P (t2)
-		  || (prototype_p (t1)
-		      && prototype_p (t2)
-		      && !types_compatible_p (t1, t2))))
-	    {
-	      /* Warn for incompatibilities.  Avoid warning for functions
-		 without a prototype to make it possible to declare aliases
-		 without knowing the exact type, as libstdc++ does.  */
-	      if (warning_at (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (p->decl), OPT_Wattributes,
-			      "%q+D alias between functions of incompatible "
-			      "types %qT and %qT", p->decl, t1, t2))
-		inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (target_node->decl),
-			"aliased declaration here");
-	    }
+          maybe_diag_incompatible_alias (p->decl, target_node->decl);
 
 	  cgraph_node *src_node = cgraph_node::get (p->decl);
 	  if (src_node && src_node->definition)
diff --git a/gcc/common.opt b/gcc/common.opt
index dfde6ad..69abe10 100644
--- a/gcc/common.opt
+++ b/gcc/common.opt
@@ -562,6 +562,10 @@ Wattributes
 Common Var(warn_attributes) Init(1) Warning
 Warn about inappropriate attribute usage.
 
+Wattribute-alias
+Common Var(warn_attributes) Init(1) Warning
+Warn about type safety and similar errors in attribute alias and related.
+
 Wcast-align
 Common Var(warn_cast_align) Warning
 Warn about pointer casts which increase alignment.
diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
index 9064561..ecef39a 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
@@ -2801,7 +2801,7 @@ void *my_memcpy (void *dst, const void *src, size_t len)
 
 static void * (*resolve_memcpy (void))(void *, const void *, size_t)
 @{
-  return my_memcpy; // we'll just always select this routine
+  return my_memcpy; // we will just always select this routine
 @}
 @end smallexample
 
@@ -2814,15 +2814,56 @@ extern void *memcpy (void *, const void *, size_t);
 @end smallexample
 
 @noindent
-allowing the user to call this as a regular function, unaware of the
-implementation.  Finally, the indirect function needs to be defined in
-the same translation unit as the resolver function:
+allowing the user to call @code{memcpy} as a regular function, unaware of
+the actual implementation.  Finally, the indirect function needs to be
+defined in the same translation unit as the resolver function:
 
 @smallexample
 void *memcpy (void *, const void *, size_t)
      __attribute__ ((ifunc ("resolve_memcpy")));
 @end smallexample
 
+In C++, the @code{ifunc} attribute takes a string that is the mangled name
+of the resolver function.  A C++ resolver for a non-static member function
+of class @code{C} should be declared to return a pointer to a non-member
+function taking pointer to @code{C} as the first argument, followed by
+the same arguments as of the implementation function.  G++ checks
+the signatures of the two functions and issues
+a @option{-Wattribute-alias} warning for mismatches.  To suppress a warning
+for the necessary cast from a pointer to the implementation member function
+to the type of the corresponding non-member function use
+the @option{-Wno-pmf-conversions} option.  For example:
+
+@smallexample
+class S
+@{
+private:
+  int debug_impl (int);
+  int optimized_impl (int);
+
+  typedef int Func (S*, int);
+
+  static Func* resolver ();
+public:
+
+  int interface (int);
+@};
+
+int S::debug_impl (int) @{ /* @r{@dots{}} */ @}
+int S::optimized_impl (int) @{ /* @r{@dots{}} */ @}
+
+S::Func* S::resolver ()
+@{
+  int (S::*pimpl) (int)
+    = getenv ("DEBUG") ? &S::debug_impl : &S::optimized_impl;
+
+  // Cast triggers -Wno-pmf-conversions.
+  return reinterpret_cast<Func*>(pimpl);
+@}
+
+int S::interface (int) __attribute__ ((ifunc ("_ZN1S8resolverEv")));
+@end smallexample
+
 Indirect functions cannot be weak.  Binutils version 2.20.1 or higher
 and GNU C Library version 2.11.1 are required to use this feature.
 
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index f862b7f..de1943f 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -5382,6 +5382,11 @@ pointers. This warning level may give a larger number of
 false positives and is deactivated by default.
 @end table
 
+@item -Wattribute-alias
+Warn about declarations using the @code{alias} and similar attributes whose
+target is incompatible with the type of the alias.  @xref{Function Attributes,
+,Declaring Attributes of Functions}.
+
 @item -Wbool-compare
 @opindex Wno-bool-compare
 @opindex Wbool-compare
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-1.C
index 2c7bba1..4a29e8b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-1.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-1.C
@@ -4,26 +4,33 @@
 
 struct Klass
 {
+  int a[4];
+
   int implementation ();
   int magic ();
 
-  typedef int (Klass::*MemFuncPtr)();
+  /* An ifunc resolver must return a pointer to an ordinary (non-member)
+     function.  To make it possible to use ifunc with member functions,
+     the resolver must convert a member function pointer to an ordinary
+     function pointer (slicing off the high word).  */
+  typedef int Func (Klass*);
 
-  static MemFuncPtr resolver ();
+  static Func* resolver ();
 };
 
-Klass::MemFuncPtr p = &Klass::implementation;
-
-int Klass::implementation (void)
+int Klass::implementation ()
 {
   __builtin_printf ("'ere I am JH\n");
-  return 1234;
+  return a[0] + a[1] + a[2] + a[3];
 }
 
-
-Klass::MemFuncPtr Klass::resolver (void)
+Klass::Func* Klass::resolver (void)
 {
-  return &Klass::implementation;
+  /* GCC guarantees this conversion to be safe and the resulting pointer
+     usable to call the member function using ordinary (i.e., non-member)
+     function call syntax.  */
+
+  return reinterpret_cast<Func*>(&Klass::implementation);
 }
 
 int f (void) __attribute__ ((ifunc ("foo")));
@@ -32,11 +39,16 @@ typedef int (F)(void);
 extern "C" F* foo () { return 0; }
 
 
-int Klass::magic (void) __attribute__ ((ifunc ("_ZN5Klass8resolverEv")));
+int Klass::magic () __attribute__ ((ifunc ("_ZN5Klass8resolverEv")));
 
 int main ()
 {
   Klass obj;
 
-  return !(obj.magic () == 1234);
+  obj.a[0] = 1;
+  obj.a[1] = 2;
+  obj.a[2] = 3;
+  obj.a[3] = 4;
+
+  return !(obj.magic () == 10);
 }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-2.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-2.C
index 1fc940b..e5be3d2 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-2.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-2.C
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ struct Klass
   int implementation ();
   int magic ();
 
-  typedef int (Klass::*MemFuncPtr)();
+  typedef int Func (Klass*);
 
-  static MemFuncPtr resolver ();
+  static Func* resolver ();
 };
 
 int Klass::implementation (void)
@@ -20,9 +20,13 @@ int Klass::implementation (void)
   return 0;
 }
 
-Klass::MemFuncPtr Klass::resolver (void)
+Klass::Func* Klass::resolver (void)
 {
-  return &Klass::implementation;
+  /* GCC guarantees this conversion to be safe and the resulting pointer
+     usable to call the member function using ordinary (i.e., non-member)
+     function call syntax.  */
+
+  return reinterpret_cast<Func*>(&Klass::implementation);
 }
 
 int Klass::magic (void) __attribute__ ((ifunc ("_ZN5Klass8resolverEv")));
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-3.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-3.C
index 04206a1..6d49424 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-3.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-3.C
@@ -6,23 +6,29 @@
 
 struct Klass
 {
+  int a[4];
+
   int implementation ();
   int magic ();
 
-  typedef int (Klass::*MemFuncPtr)();
+  typedef int Func (Klass*);
 
-  static MemFuncPtr resolver ();
+  static Func* resolver ();
 };
 
 int Klass::implementation (void)
 {
   printf ("'ere I am JH\n");
-  return 0;
+  return a[0] + a[1] + a[2] + a[3];
 }
 
-Klass::MemFuncPtr Klass::resolver (void)
+Klass::Func* Klass::resolver ()
 {
-  return &Klass::implementation;
+  /* GCC guarantees this conversion to be safe and the resulting pointer
+     usable to call the member function using ordinary (i.e., non-member)
+     function call syntax.  */
+
+  return reinterpret_cast<Func*>(&Klass::implementation);
 }
 
 int Klass::magic (void) __attribute__ ((ifunc ("_ZN5Klass8resolverEv")));
@@ -36,5 +42,10 @@ int main ()
 {
   Klass obj;
 
-  return Foo (obj, &Klass::magic) != 0;
+  obj.a[0] = 1;
+  obj.a[1] = 2;
+  obj.a[2] = 3;
+  obj.a[3] = 4;
+
+  return Foo (obj, &Klass::magic) != 10;
 }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-4.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-4.C
index 3127193..f71dc3b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-4.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-4.C
@@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ struct Klassier : Klass
   int implementation ();
   int magic ();
 
-  typedef int (Klassier::*MemFuncPtr)();
+  typedef int Func (Klass*);
 
-  static MemFuncPtr resolver ();
+  static Func* resolver ();
 };
 
 int Klassier::implementation (void)
@@ -25,9 +25,13 @@ int Klassier::implementation (void)
   return 0;
 }
 
-Klassier::MemFuncPtr Klassier::resolver (void)
+Klassier::Func* Klassier::resolver ()
 {
-  return &Klassier::implementation;
+  /* GCC guarantees this conversion to be safe and the resulting pointer
+     usable to call the member function using ordinary (i.e., non-member)
+     function call syntax.  */
+
+  return reinterpret_cast<Func*>(&Klassier::implementation);
 }
 
 int Klassier::magic (void) __attribute__ ((ifunc ("_ZN8Klassier8resolverEv")));
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-5.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-5.C
index 05855dd..fd8bcff 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-5.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-5.C
@@ -1,15 +1,21 @@
 // PR c/81854 - weak alias of an incompatible symbol accepted
 // { dg-do compile }
 // { dg-require-ifunc "" } */
+// { dg-options "-Wextra -Wno-pmf-conversions" }
 
 struct Klass
 {
   int implementation ();
-  const char* magic ();
+  int good_magic ();
+  int iffy_magic ();
+  const char* bad_magic ();
 
+  typedef int (Func)(Klass*);
   typedef int (Klass::*MemFuncPtr)();
 
-  static MemFuncPtr resolver ();
+  static Func* good_resolver ();
+  static void* iffy_resolver ();
+  static MemFuncPtr bad_resolver ();
 };
 
 int Klass::implementation (void)
@@ -17,13 +23,42 @@ int Klass::implementation (void)
   return 0;
 }
 
-const char* __attribute__ ((ifunc ("_ZN5Klass8resolverEv")))
-  Klass::magic ();   // { dg-warning "alias between functions of incompatible types" }
+// Verify no warning for the expected/compatible declaration.
 
+int __attribute__ ((ifunc ("_ZN5Klass13good_resolverEv")))
+Klass::good_magic ();
+
+Klass::Func*
+Klass::good_resolver (void)
+{
+  MemFuncPtr mfp = &Klass::implementation;
+
+  return reinterpret_cast<Func*>(mfp);
+}
+
+
+// Verify a warning for the unsafe declaration.
+
+int __attribute__ ((ifunc ("_ZN5Klass13iffy_resolverEv")))
+Klass::iffy_magic ();    // { dg-message "resolver indirect function declared here" }
+
+void*
+Klass::iffy_resolver (void)   // { dg-warning ".ifunc. resolver for .int Klass::iffy_magic\\(\\). should return .int \\(\\*\\)\\(Klass\\*\\)." }
+{
+  MemFuncPtr mfp = &Klass::implementation;
+
+  return reinterpret_cast<void*>(mfp);
+}
+
+
+// Verify an error for an incompatible declaration.
+
+const char* __attribute__ ((ifunc ("_ZN5Klass12bad_resolverEv")))
+Klass::bad_magic ();   // { dg-message "resolver indirect function declared here" }
 
 
 Klass::MemFuncPtr
-Klass::resolver (void) // { dg-message "aliased declaration here" }
+Klass::bad_resolver (void)   // { dg-error ".ifunc. resolver for .const char\\* Klass::bad_magic\\(\\). must return .const char\\* \\(\\*\\)\\(Klass\\*\\)." }
 {
   return &Klass::implementation;
 }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-6.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-6.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..918123d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-6.C
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+// PR c/81854 - weak alias of an incompatible symbol accepted
+// { dg-do run }
+// { dg-require-ifunc "" }
+// { dg-options "-Wno-pmf-conversions" }
+
+struct Klass
+{
+  int a[4];
+
+  int implementation (int);
+  int implementation (int, long, const char*);
+
+  int magic (int);
+  int magic (int, long, const char *);
+
+  /* An ifunc resolver must return a pointer to an ordinary (non-member)
+     function.  To make it possible to use ifunc with member functions,
+     the resolver must convert a member function pointer to an ordinary
+     function pointer (slicing off the high word).  */
+  typedef int Func1 (Klass*, int);
+  typedef int Func3 (Klass*, int, long, const char*);
+
+  template <class Func>
+  static Func* resolver ();
+};
+
+const char *str;
+
+int Klass::implementation (int x)
+{
+  return a[0] + a[1] + a[2] + a[3] + x;
+}
+
+int Klass::implementation (int x, long y, const char *s)
+{
+  return a[0] + a[1] + a[2] + a[3] + x + y + !(s == str);
+}
+
+template <>
+Klass::Func1* Klass::resolver<Klass::Func1> ()
+{
+  int (Klass::*pmf)(int) = &Klass::implementation;
+
+  /* GCC guarantees this conversion to be safe and the resulting pointer
+     usable to call the member function using ordinary (i.e., non-member)
+     function call syntax.  The cast triggers -Wno-pmf-conversions which
+     the test suppresses.  */
+
+  return reinterpret_cast<Func1*>(pmf);
+}
+
+template <>
+Klass::Func3* Klass::resolver<Klass::Func3> ()
+{
+  int (Klass::*pmf)(int, long, const char*) = &Klass::implementation;
+
+  return reinterpret_cast<Func3*>(pmf);
+}
+
+__attribute__ ((ifunc ("_ZN5Klass8resolverIFiPS_iEEEPT_v")))
+int Klass::magic (int);
+
+__attribute__ ((ifunc ("_ZN5Klass8resolverIFiPS_ilPKcEEEPT_v")))
+int Klass::magic (int, long, const char *);
+
+int main ()
+{
+  Klass obj;
+
+  obj.a[0] = 1;
+  obj.a[1] = 2;
+  obj.a[2] = 3;
+  obj.a[3] = 4;
+
+  str = "teststring";
+
+  // Verify that data members and function arguments are correctly
+  // retrieved.
+  if (obj.magic (5) != 15 || obj.magic (5, 6, str) != 21)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.abi/vtable2.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.abi/vtable2.C
index 2c88a95..96533e0 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.abi/vtable2.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.abi/vtable2.C
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 // { dg-do run  }
-// { dg-options "-Wno-attributes -fno-strict-aliasing" }
+// { dg-options "-Wno-attribute-alias -fno-strict-aliasing" }
 // Origin: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
 
 #if defined (__GXX_ABI_VERSION) && __GXX_ABI_VERSION >= 100
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-ifunc-6.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-ifunc-6.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2af82ab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-ifunc-6.c
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+/* { dg-do compile }  */
+/* { dg-require-ifunc "" } */
+/* { dg-options "" } */
+
+static int implementation (void)
+{
+  return 0;
+}
+
+/* Verify that a resolver that returns void* is not diagnosed without
+   -Wextra (see attr-ifunc-7.c for a test that verifies that -Wextra
+   triggers the warning).  */
+static void* resolver_nowarn (void)
+{
+  return implementation;
+}
+
+extern int
+indirect_nowarn (void) __attribute__ ((ifunc ("resolver_nowarn")));
+
+
+/* Verify that a resolver that returns a T* that's not void* is diagnosed
+   even without -Wextra.  */
+static int* resolver_warn (void)   /* { dg-warning ".ifunc. resolver for .indirect_warn. should return 'int \\(\\*\\)\\(void\\)." } */
+{
+  return (int *)implementation;
+}
+
+extern int
+indirect_warn (void)   /* { dg-message "" } */
+__attribute__ ((ifunc ("resolver_warn")));
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-ifunc-7.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-ifunc-7.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a8e18ed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-ifunc-7.c
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+/* { dg-do compile }  */
+/* { dg-require-ifunc "" } */
+/* { dg-options "-Wextra" } */
+
+static int implementation (void)
+{
+  return 0;
+}
+
+/* Verify that a resolver that returns void* is diagnosed with -Wextra.  */
+static void* resolver_warn (void)   /* { dg-warning ".ifunc. resolver for .indirect_warn. should return .int \\(\\*\\)\\(void\\)." } */
+{
+  return implementation;
+}
+
+extern __attribute__ ((ifunc ("resolver_warn"))) int
+indirect_warn (void);   /* { dg-message "resolver indirect function declared here" } */
+
+
+
+/* Verify that a resolver that returns int* is still diagnosed, even
+   with -Wextra.  */
+static int* resolver_warn_2 (void)   /* { dg-warning ".ifunc. resolver for .indirect_warn_2. should return .int \\(\\*\\)\\(void\\)." } */
+{
+  return (int *)implementation;
+}
+
+extern __attribute__ ((ifunc ("resolver_warn_2"))) int
+indirect_warn_2 (void);   /* { dg-message "resolver indirect function declared here" } */
+
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr81854.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr81854.c
index b8499f8..1021a81 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr81854.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr81854.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 /* PR c/81854 - weak alias of an incompatible symbol accepted
    { dg-do compile }
-   { dg-require-ifunc "" } */
+   { dg-require-ifunc "" }
+   { dg-options "-Wextra" } */
 
 const char* __attribute__ ((weak, alias ("f0_target")))
 f0 (void);          /* { dg-error "alias between function and variable" } */
@@ -26,39 +27,37 @@ const char* f2_target (int i)   /* { dg-message "aliased declaration here" } */
   return 0;
 }
 
-
 int __attribute__ ((ifunc ("f3_resolver")))
-f3 (void);          /* { dg-error ".ifunc. resolver must return a function pointer" } */
+f3 (void);          /* { dg-message "resolver indirect function declared here" } */
 
-int f3_resolver (void)   /* { dg-message "resolver declaration here" } */
+void* f3_resolver (void) /* { dg-warning "ifunc. resolver for .f3. should return .int \\(\\*\\)\\(void\\)." } */
 {
   return 0;
 }
 
 
 int __attribute__ ((ifunc ("f4_resolver")))
-f4 (void);          /* { dg-warning ".ifunc. resolver should return a function pointer" } */
+f4 (void);          /* { dg-message "resolver indirect function declared here" } */
 
-void* f4_resolver (void) /* { dg-message "resolver declaration here" } */
+typedef void F4 (void);
+F4* f4_resolver (void) /* { dg-warning ".ifunc. resolver for .f4. should return .int \\(\\*\\)\\(void\\)" } */
 {
   return 0;
 }
 
+const char* __attribute__ ((ifunc ("f5_resolver")))
+f5 (void);
 
-int __attribute__ ((ifunc ("f5_resolver")))
-f5 (void);          /* { dg-warning "alias between functions of incompatible types" } */
-
-typedef void F5 (void);
-F5* f5_resolver (void) /* { dg-message "aliased declaration here" } */
+typedef const char* F5 (void);
+F5* f5_resolver (void)
 {
   return 0;
 }
 
-const char* __attribute__ ((ifunc ("f6_resolver")))
-f6 (void);
+int __attribute__ ((ifunc ("f6_resolver")))
+f6 (void);          /* { dg-message "resolver indirect function declared here" } */
 
-typedef const char* F6 (void);
-F6* f6_resolver (void)
+int f6_resolver (void)   /* { dg-error ".ifunc. resolver for 'f6' must return .int \\(\\*\\)\\(void\\)." } */
 {
   return 0;
 }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
index 57f646c..cf312a1 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
@@ -440,8 +440,8 @@ proc check_ifunc_available { } {
 	extern "C" {
 	#endif
 	typedef void F (void);
-	F* g() {}
-	void f() __attribute__((ifunc("g")));
+	F* g (void) {}
+	void f () __attribute__ ((ifunc ("g")));
 	#ifdef __cplusplus
 	}
 	#endif

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]