This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR82397


On Mon, 9 Oct 2017, Richard Biener wrote:

> On Sat, 7 Oct 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> 
> > Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> writes:
> > > I am testing the following patch to fix the qsort intransitiveness
> > > of dr_group_sort_cmp.  The patch removes the overly powerful
> > > operand_equal_p checks (handling commutativity )
> > > because those do not mix well with the sorting constraints.
> > >
> > > I am also testing a followup to address the missed equalities by
> > > canonicalization -- the interesting trees happen to be all built
> > > by split_constant_offset where we can do some elaborate canonicalization
> > > in linear complexity (as opposed to operand_equal_p's exponential
> > > handling or trying to handle it in data_ref_compare_tree where it would
> > > be done at least multiple times during qsort invocation).
> > >
> > > Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing still in progress
> > > (so is a quick SPEC 2k6 build where the issue showed up in multiple
> > > places).
> > >
> > > Richard.
> > >
> > > 2017-10-06  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>
> > >
> > > 	PR tree-optimization/82397
> > > 	* tree-vect-data-refs.c (dr_group_sort_cmp): Do not use
> > > 	operand_equal_p but rely on data_ref_compare_tree for detecting
> > > 	equalities.
> > > 	(vect_analyze_data_ref_accesses): Use data_ref_compare_tree
> > > 	to match up with dr_group_sort_cmp.
> > >
> > > 	* gfortran.dg/pr82397.f: New testcase.
> > >
> > > Index: gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c	(revision 253475)
> > > +++ gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c	(working copy)
> > > @@ -2727,43 +2727,30 @@ dr_group_sort_cmp (const void *dra_, con
> > >      return loopa->num < loopb->num ? -1 : 1;
> > >  
> > >    /* Ordering of DRs according to base.  */
> > > -  if (!operand_equal_p (DR_BASE_ADDRESS (dra), DR_BASE_ADDRESS (drb), 0))
> > > -    {
> > > -      cmp = data_ref_compare_tree (DR_BASE_ADDRESS (dra),
> > > -				   DR_BASE_ADDRESS (drb));
> > > -      if (cmp != 0)
> > > -        return cmp;
> > > -    }
> > > +  cmp = data_ref_compare_tree (DR_BASE_ADDRESS (dra),
> > > +			       DR_BASE_ADDRESS (drb));
> > > +  if (cmp != 0)
> > > +    return cmp;
> > >  
> > >    /* And according to DR_OFFSET.  */
> > > -  if (!dr_equal_offsets_p (dra, drb))
> > > -    {
> > > -      cmp = data_ref_compare_tree (DR_OFFSET (dra), DR_OFFSET (drb));
> > > -      if (cmp != 0)
> > > -        return cmp;
> > > -    }
> > > +  cmp = data_ref_compare_tree (DR_OFFSET (dra), DR_OFFSET (drb));
> > > +  if (cmp != 0)
> > > +    return cmp;
> > >  
> > >    /* Put reads before writes.  */
> > >    if (DR_IS_READ (dra) != DR_IS_READ (drb))
> > >      return DR_IS_READ (dra) ? -1 : 1;
> > >  
> > >    /* Then sort after access size.  */
> > > -  if (!operand_equal_p (TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (TREE_TYPE (DR_REF (dra))),
> > > -			TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (TREE_TYPE (DR_REF (drb))), 0))
> > > -    {
> > > -      cmp = data_ref_compare_tree (TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (TREE_TYPE (DR_REF (dra))),
> > > -				   TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (TREE_TYPE (DR_REF (drb))));
> > > -      if (cmp != 0)
> > > -        return cmp;
> > > -    }
> > > +  cmp = data_ref_compare_tree (TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (TREE_TYPE (DR_REF (dra))),
> > > +			       TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (TREE_TYPE (DR_REF (drb))));
> > > +  if (cmp != 0)
> > > +    return cmp;
> > >  
> > >    /* And after step.  */
> > > -  if (!operand_equal_p (DR_STEP (dra), DR_STEP (drb), 0))
> > > -    {
> > > -      cmp = data_ref_compare_tree (DR_STEP (dra), DR_STEP (drb));
> > > -      if (cmp != 0)
> > > -        return cmp;
> > > -    }
> > > +  cmp = data_ref_compare_tree (DR_STEP (dra), DR_STEP (drb));
> > > +  if (cmp != 0)
> > > +    return cmp;
> > >  
> > >    /* Then sort after DR_INIT.  In case of identical DRs sort after stmt UID.  */
> > >    cmp = tree_int_cst_compare (DR_INIT (dra), DR_INIT (drb));
> > > @@ -2835,9 +2822,9 @@ vect_analyze_data_ref_accesses (vec_info
> > >  	     and they are both either store or load (not load and store,
> > >  	     not masked loads or stores).  */
> > >  	  if (DR_IS_READ (dra) != DR_IS_READ (drb)
> > > -	      || !operand_equal_p (DR_BASE_ADDRESS (dra),
> > > -				   DR_BASE_ADDRESS (drb), 0)
> > > -	      || !dr_equal_offsets_p (dra, drb)
> > > +	      || data_ref_compare_tree (DR_BASE_ADDRESS (dra),
> > > +					DR_BASE_ADDRESS (drb)) != 0
> > > +	      || data_ref_compare_tree (DR_OFFSET (dra), DR_OFFSET (drb)) != 0
> > >  	      || !gimple_assign_single_p (DR_STMT (dra))
> > >  	      || !gimple_assign_single_p (DR_STMT (drb)))
> > >  	    break;
> > > @@ -2851,7 +2838,7 @@ vect_analyze_data_ref_accesses (vec_info
> > >  	    break;
> > >  
> > >  	  /* Check that the data-refs have the same step.  */
> > > -	  if (!operand_equal_p (DR_STEP (dra), DR_STEP (drb), 0))
> > > +	  if (data_ref_compare_tree (DR_STEP (dra), DR_STEP (drb)) != 0)
> > >  	    break;
> > >  
> > >  	  /* Do not place the same access in the interleaving chain twice.  */
> > 
> > I don't think data_ref_compare_tree is strong enough to replace
> > operand_equal_p when equality is needed for correctness.
> > A lot of data_ref_compare_tree just uses hash values and can
> > return 0 for things that aren't actually equal.  (Although maybe
> > that's the bug...)
> 
> Hmm, yeah.  I think it's unfortunate (and given how we consume
> the ordered dataref set a possible wrong-code issue).
> 
> So the only issue is with comparing constants (plus stripping
> sign-conversions maybe).  I think for those types where no
> total order exists we could resort to memcmp on native encodings.
> I don't expect we run into anything but INTEGER_CSTs here.
> After all the default case w/o checking expects tcc_expression
> if not tcc_declaration unless TREE_OPERAND_LENGTH returns zero
> in which case we just declare equality...
> 
> So I'm going to give the following some broader testing.

And this is what I have applied.

Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, SPEC CPU 2006 tested.

Richard.

2017-10-09  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>

	PR tree-optimization/82397
	* tree-data-ref.c (data_ref_compare_tree): Make sure to return
	equality only for semantically equal trees.

Index: gcc/tree-data-ref.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/tree-data-ref.c	(revision 253486)
+++ gcc/tree-data-ref.c	(working copy)
@@ -1207,35 +1207,28 @@ data_ref_compare_tree (tree t1, tree t2)
   if (t2 == NULL)
     return 1;
 
-  STRIP_NOPS (t1);
-  STRIP_NOPS (t2);
+  STRIP_USELESS_TYPE_CONVERSION (t1);
+  STRIP_USELESS_TYPE_CONVERSION (t2);
+  if (t1 == t2)
+    return 0;
 
-  if (TREE_CODE (t1) != TREE_CODE (t2))
+  if (TREE_CODE (t1) != TREE_CODE (t2)
+      && ! (CONVERT_EXPR_P (t1) && CONVERT_EXPR_P (t2)))
     return TREE_CODE (t1) < TREE_CODE (t2) ? -1 : 1;
 
   code = TREE_CODE (t1);
   switch (code)
     {
-    /* For const values, we can just use hash values for comparisons.  */
     case INTEGER_CST:
-    case REAL_CST:
-    case FIXED_CST:
+      return tree_int_cst_compare (t1, t2);
+
     case STRING_CST:
-    case COMPLEX_CST:
-    case VECTOR_CST:
-      {
-	hashval_t h1 = iterative_hash_expr (t1, 0);
-	hashval_t h2 = iterative_hash_expr (t2, 0);
-	if (h1 != h2)
-	  return h1 < h2 ? -1 : 1;
-	break;
-      }
+      if (TREE_STRING_LENGTH (t1) != TREE_STRING_LENGTH (t2))
+	return TREE_STRING_LENGTH (t1) < TREE_STRING_LENGTH (t2) ? -1 : 1;
+      return memcmp (TREE_STRING_POINTER (t1), TREE_STRING_POINTER (t2),
+		     TREE_STRING_LENGTH (t1));
 
     case SSA_NAME:
-      cmp = data_ref_compare_tree (SSA_NAME_VAR (t1), SSA_NAME_VAR (t2));
-      if (cmp != 0)
-	return cmp;
-
       if (SSA_NAME_VERSION (t1) != SSA_NAME_VERSION (t2))
 	return SSA_NAME_VERSION (t1) < SSA_NAME_VERSION (t2) ? -1 : 1;
       break;
@@ -1243,22 +1236,26 @@ data_ref_compare_tree (tree t1, tree t2)
     default:
       tclass = TREE_CODE_CLASS (code);
 
-      /* For var-decl, we could compare their UIDs.  */
+      /* For decls, compare their UIDs.  */
       if (tclass == tcc_declaration)
 	{
 	  if (DECL_UID (t1) != DECL_UID (t2))
 	    return DECL_UID (t1) < DECL_UID (t2) ? -1 : 1;
 	  break;
 	}
-
-      /* For expressions with operands, compare their operands recursively.  */
-      for (i = TREE_OPERAND_LENGTH (t1) - 1; i >= 0; --i)
+      /* For expressions, compare their operands recursively.  */
+      else if (IS_EXPR_CODE_CLASS (tclass))
 	{
-	  cmp = data_ref_compare_tree (TREE_OPERAND (t1, i),
-				       TREE_OPERAND (t2, i));
-	  if (cmp != 0)
-	    return cmp;
+	  for (i = TREE_OPERAND_LENGTH (t1) - 1; i >= 0; --i)
+	    {
+	      cmp = data_ref_compare_tree (TREE_OPERAND (t1, i),
+					   TREE_OPERAND (t2, i));
+	      if (cmp != 0)
+		return cmp;
+	    }
 	}
+      else
+	gcc_unreachable ();
     }
 
   return 0;


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]