This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Introduce configure flag --with-stage1-cflags.


On 08/28/2017 02:24 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 07/31/2017 01:47 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> I would like to ping this. Input from other people will be appreciated ;)
>> I think the thing to keep in mind here is that IIUC this only affects
>> things when we've configured using the --with-stage1-cflags option.
>>
>> So questions about is -O1 more stable than -O2, should we restrict -O2
>> to newer compilers, etc are really more about the defaults we set.
>>
>> My understanding is the patch is just adding the capability and does not
>> change the default.  Assuming that's the case, then I'm comfortable
>> acking the raw infrastructure.
> 
> OTOH you can simply set STAGE1_CFLAGS so the value of this
> as a configure option is somewhat questionable.

Yes, STAGE1_CFLAGS is a working solution. I'm not planning to install the patch.

Martin

> 
>> jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]