This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v12] add -fpatchable-function-entry=N,M option


> On Aug 1, 2017, at 1:52 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> wrote:
> 
> On Aug 01 2017, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 31 Jul 2017, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>>> I don't see an easy way to correctly differentiate between "attribute" 
>>> nops and "bundle" nops, so XFAILing these tests on ia64 seems like a 
>>> valid approach.
>> 
>> Make sense, given that the use of Itanium has gone done drastically.
> 
> You can get the same failure with any target, for example if there are
> delay slots to be filled.

Andreas,

Do you know a reliable way of checking whether target can issue nops in simple code?

One alternative would be to apply testcase only to white-listed architectures, which is, imo, less preferable.

Regards,

--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
www.linaro.org


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]