This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH v12] add -fpatchable-function-entry=N,M option
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim dot kuvyrkov at linaro dot org>
- Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, Torsten Duwe <duwe at suse dot de>, "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>, Sandra Loosemore <sandra at codesourcery dot com>, Marek Polacek <polacek at redhat dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs dot nagy at arm dot com>, nd at arm dot com, Li Bin <huawei dot libin at huawei dot com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina at suse dot cz>, Marcus Shawcroft <Marcus dot Shawcroft at arm dot com>, Takahiro Akashi <takahiro dot akashi at linaro dot org>, Andrew Wafaa <Andrew dot Wafaa at arm dot com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 04:43:51 -0600 (MDT)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v12] add -fpatchable-function-entry=N,M option
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20170706140311.GA20710@suse.de> <d3e6d7a1-1f1c-c0b5-133a-0ab29eb5034d@arm.com> <20170707193028.GA17752@suse.de> <mvmbmo7uvuu.fsf@suse.de> <20170726142629.GG22969@suse.de> <mvm379juv2y.fsf@suse.de> <F3E4420A-1F0D-48F0-978B-4A6C0B65A4E1@linaro.org>
On Mon, 31 Jul 2017, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> I don't see an easy way to correctly differentiate between "attribute"
> nops and "bundle" nops, so XFAILing these tests on ia64 seems like a
> valid approach.
Make sense, given that the use of Itanium has gone done drastically.
Gerald