This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Introduce internal_error_cont and exclude it from pot files
- From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- To: Martin Liška <mliska at suse dot cz>, Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: David Malcolm <dmalcolm at redhat dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Martin Sebor <msebor at gmail dot com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 09:11:51 -0600
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Introduce internal_error_cont and exclude it from pot files
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
- Authentication-results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=law at redhat dot com
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com CA4C5C0587EB
- Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com CA4C5C0587EB
- References: <04960289-c151-4f57-6059-349ee9fc2f56@suse.cz> <1489602781.28956.51.camel@redhat.com> <3767ecfe-f8bf-2cf0-fd03-a0d588f2cbbd@suse.cz> <28c77f04-dbc1-1297-d7c3-f94700274a7e@suse.cz> <408e109b-94ca-3e8d-8e3c-571fee8ca3b0@redhat.com> <d6fac26f-652d-92cd-13af-f560ac10d63e@suse.cz> <1bfa91df-48ff-2add-95a1-067eaa17eab4@redhat.com> <CAFiYyc0iAkxzw2H5fkowzUn5j4vs-hrKjHeJ1ty9csZbEaJjyg@mail.gmail.com> <87b714dd-8c48-43d6-a01d-e74eed458b80@suse.cz>
On 06/30/2017 04:31 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 04/10/2017 05:44 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On 04/07/2017 04:30 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 04/06/2017 06:44 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 03/24/2017 03:29 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to ping that. I'm not sure what's agreement after I read
>>>>>> discussion in: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-03/msg00070.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Martin Sebor may know, CC'ing him.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not sure if you're pinging the internal_error_cont stuff, or the ODR
>>>>> diagnostics changes.
>>>>>
>>>>> WRT the ODR diagnostics, I'd say let's go with the C++17 style
>>>>> (all-lowercase with a hyphen).
>>>>>
>>>>> If you've got a pointer to the internal_err_cont changes, please pass it
>>>>> along.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yep, I was interested in internal_err_cont. It's next stage1 material, but
>>>> I'm willing to have
>>>> a feedback whether separation of internal messages is desired to be
>>>> excluded from translation or not?
>>>
>>> As stage1 stuff, I'll largely be ignoring.
>>>
>>> I'm torn on translating this stuff. It's hard enough for a non-developer to
>>> interpret an ICE message, if it's not in their native language it'd be
>>> impossible.
>>>
>>> OTOH, if we translate and the user forwards the translated message to us, we
>>> may not be able to interpret.
>>>
>>> That probably argues there's some part that should be translated to be
>>> easier for the users, but the real guts of the message should not be
>>> translated.
>>
>> Message number and catalogue.
>>
>> /me runs...
>>
>>> jeff
>
> I there any discussion going on this topic? If not, I'll probably leave it as it is.
No ongoing discussion -- I'm working through my backlog of items that
were deferred for gcc-8 stage1 as well as items that I couldn't get to
while focused on stack-clash.
jeff