This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: [GCC][PATCH][ARM] Require arm_arch_v8a_ok for sdiv_costs_1.c
- From: Tamar Christina <Tamar dot Christina at arm dot com>
- To: Christophe Lyon <christophe dot lyon at linaro dot org>, Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo dot tkachov at foss dot arm dot com>
- Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, nd <nd at arm dot com>, "Ramana Radhakrishnan" <Ramana dot Radhakrishnan at arm dot com>, Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 09:26:45 +0000
- Subject: RE: [GCC][PATCH][ARM] Require arm_arch_v8a_ok for sdiv_costs_1.c
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: linaro.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;linaro.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Nodisclaimer: True
- References: <VI1PR0801MB2031461F4FC6FAF4C03E0C24FFC20@VI1PR0801MB2031.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <593FBAB6.7080607@foss.arm.com> <CAKdteOaWKAJvL9KO+d1TJ44HqcKggzdtC=TFnonBter_miTa7A@mail.gmail.com>
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
> >> * gcc.target/arm/sdiv_costs_1.c:
> >> Require arm_arch_v8a_ok and add march option.
> >>
>
> Shouldn't you use
> add_options_for_arm_arch_v8a instead?
Done, committed as r249214.
I don't quite understand the difference, but this test suite does quite
counter intuitive things.
>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Tamar
> >
> >