This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, GCC/testsuite/ARM] Make gcc.target/arm/its.c more robust


On 15/06/17 09:18, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
> 
> 
> On 14/06/17 18:03, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>> On 14/06/17 17:49, Thomas Preudhomme wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Testcase gcc.target/arm/its.c was added as part of a patch [1] to limit
>>> IT blocks to 2 instructions maximum. However, the patch was only tested
>>> indirectly by *aiming* to check that the assembly output does not
>>> contain a single IT block with all conditional code in it. This was
>>> actually implemented by expecting exactly 2 IT blocks.
>>>
>>> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00764.html
>>>
>>> This does not work as proved by the regression following code changes
>>> brought by r248863: some of the instructions are conditionally executed
>>> using a branch and thus there is only one IT block. This patch changes
>>> the logic to look for an IT block with more than 2 conditions, ie. IT
>>> followed by zero or one non space letter.
>>>
>>> This patch also restrict the testcase to Thumb-only devices since the
>>> patch the testcase was contributed with only concerned ARMv7-M targets.
>>> Since tuning for ARMv7E-M targets is even more restrictive (only one
>>> instruction per IT block), restricting the testcase to all Thumb-only
>>> devices is sufficient.
>>>
>>> ChangeLog entry is as follows:
>>>
>>> *** gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog ***
>>>
>>> 2017-06-09  Thomas Preud'homme  <thomas.preudhomme@arm.com>
>>>
>>> *    gcc.target/arm/its.c: Check that no IT blocks has more than 2
>>>     instructions in it rather than the number of IT blocks being 2.
>>>     Transfer scan directive arm_thumb2 restriction to the whole
>>>     testcase and restrict further to Thumb-only targets.
>>>
>>>
>>> Testing: Test is correctly skipped when targeting Thumb mode of
>>> Cortex-A15
>>> and Cortex-M0 and PASS for Cortex-M7. Note that it FAILs for Cortex-M3
>>> and Cortex-M4 and manual inspection does reveal that an IT block is
>>> generated with more than 2 instructions in it.
>>>
>>> Is this ok for trunk?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>> make_its_test_more_robust.patch
>>>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/its.c
>>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/its.c
>>> index
>>> 5425f1e920592c911771d93a4620448b06d51394..4e07871b57886e210391db1a72d1bc5b465a49d0
>>> 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/its.c
>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/its.c
>>> @@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
>>>  /* { dg-do compile } */
>>> +/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_cortex_m } */
>>> +/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_thumb2 } */
>>>  /* { dg-options "-O2" }  */
>>>  int test (int a, int b)
>>>  {
>>> @@ -17,4 +19,6 @@ int test (int a, int b)
>>>      r -= 3;
>>>    return r;
>>>  }
>>> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\tit" 2 { target arm_thumb2 }
>>> } } */
>>> +/* Ensure there is no IT block with more than 2 instructions, ie. we
>>> only allow
>>> +   IT, ITT and ITE.  */
>>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\\sit\[^\\s\]{2,}\\s" } } */
>>>
>>
>> Wouldn't
>>
>> {dg-final { scan-assembler-not "it[te][te]" } }
>>
>> be easier to understand?
> 
> Indeed, or rather "\\sit\[te\]\[te\]" once properly escaped.
> "\\sit\[te\]{2}" also works and is even simpler so this is what this
> updated version uses.
> 

OK.

R.

> Best regards,
> 
> Thomas
> 
> make_its_test_more_robust.patch
> 
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/its.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/its.c
> index 5425f1e920592c911771d93a4620448b06d51394..f81a0df51cdb5fc26208c0a99e5c1cfb2ee4ed04 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/its.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/its.c
> @@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
>  /* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_cortex_m } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_thumb2 } */
>  /* { dg-options "-O2" }  */
>  int test (int a, int b)
>  {
> @@ -17,4 +19,6 @@ int test (int a, int b)
>      r -= 3;
>    return r;
>  }
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\tit" 2 { target arm_thumb2 } } } */
> +/* Ensure there is no IT block with more than 2 instructions, ie. we only allow
> +   IT, ITT and ITE.  */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\\sit\[te\]{2}" } } */
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]