This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[PING**4] [PATCH, ARM] Further improve stack usage in sha512, part 2 (PR 77308)
- From: Bernd Edlinger <bernd dot edlinger at hotmail dot de>
- To: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana dot radhakrishnan at arm dot com>, Richard Earnshaw <richard dot earnshaw at arm dot com>, Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo dot tkachov at foss dot arm dot com>, Wilco Dijkstra <wilco dot dijkstra at arm dot com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 12:39:26 +0000
- Subject: [PING**4] [PATCH, ARM] Further improve stack usage in sha512, part 2 (PR 77308)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: gcc.gnu.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gcc.gnu.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=hotmail.de;
- References: <AM4PR0701MB216257873FAD30D4E8975FF0E49E0@AM4PR0701MB2162.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <AM4PR0701MB216270761128D367F882BEC2E4120@AM4PR0701MB2162.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <AM4PR0701MB21629C8A8AA41E629CB4FECFE4E20@AM4PR0701MB2162.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <d2793404-f5c5-fe88-cb16-51a38ffa05c0@hotmail.de>
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
Ping...
for this patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-04/msg01568.html
On 06/01/17 18:02, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Ping...
>
> On 05/12/17 18:50, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> Ping...
>>
>> On 04/29/17 19:52, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>> Ping...
>>>
>>> I attached the latest version of my patch.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Bernd.
>>>
>>> On 12/18/16 14:14, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> this splits the *arm_negdi2, *arm_cmpdi_insn and *arm_cmpdi_unsigned
>>>> also at split1 except for TARGET_NEON and TARGET_IWMMXT.
>>>>
>>>> In the new test case the stack is reduced to about 270 bytes, except
>>>> for neon and iwmmxt, where this does not change anything.
>>>>
>>>> This patch depends on [1] and [2] before it can be applied.
>>>>
>>>> Bootstrapped and reg-tested on arm-linux-gnueabihf.
>>>> Is it OK for trunk?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Bernd.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg02796.html
>>>> [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg01562.html