This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch] Forward triviality in variant
- From: Ville Voutilainen <ville dot voutilainen at gmail dot com>
- To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Tim Shen <timshen at google dot com>, "libstdc++" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 18:43:36 +0300
- Subject: Re: [Patch] Forward triviality in variant
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAG4ZjNnp4DQXpBEs7yu-MCrfUGfk+3x=KkPZqJiQ5WWt3awnvg@mail.gmail.com> <CAG4ZjNm1vWNAS8qytZaFV7DDdS3=fONkqjgUWUA4cY0ppsuaNg@mail.gmail.com> <20170601151302.GA10443@redhat.com> <CAFk2RUZX+UcWg68yT-TXZj6sXcExzvHB4x9xg4bkN_eZvQb91Q@mail.gmail.com> <20170601152913.GC10443@redhat.com>
On 1 June 2017 at 18:29, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:
>> They all seem to be shortcuts for something::value, so it seems to me
>> logical to have
>> them all be _v.
>
>
> The _v suffixes in the standard are there to distinguish std::foo from
> std::foo_v, but we don't have that problem.
Wouldn't necessarily hurt to follow the same naming convention idea as
the standard, but sure, we
don't have that problem, agreed.