This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR80032 - handle CLOBBER gimplification differently


On Mon, 20 Mar 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 02:42:27PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > 2017-03-17  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>
> > 
> > 	PR tree-optimization/80032
> > 	* gimplify.c (gimple_push_cleanup): Add force_uncond parameter,
> > 	if set force the cleanup to happen unconditionally.
> > 	(gimplify_target_expr): Push inserted clobbers with force_uncond
> > 	to avoid them being removed by control-dependent DCE.
> > 
> > 	* g++.dg/opt/pr80032.C: New testcase.
> > 
> > !   if (gimple_conditional_context ()
> > !       && ! force_uncond)
> 
> This ought to fit on one line.
> 
> Otherwise it looks good to me.  Does the
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80032#c8
> regression happen with this patch or the earlier version of the patch?

With the DCE patch only.

> > --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr80032.C	(nonexistent)
> > +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr80032.C	(working copy)
> > @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
> > +// PR tree-optimization/80032
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +/* { dg-require-effective-target c++11 } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
> 
> It is weird to mix // and /* */ comments, better just pick one style.
> Also, // { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } is perhaps simpler.
> 
> > +/* If DCE removes too many CLOBBERs then stack usage goes through the
> > +   roof as stack slots can no longer be shared.  */
> > +/* { dg-additional-options "-Wstack-usage=200" { target x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* } } */

I'll adjust and commit.

Thanks,
Richard.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]