This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 1/5] testsuite: attr-alloc_size-11.c (PR79356)


Hi Segher,

> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:56:39AM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org> writes:
>> 
>> > As stated in the PR, this test now passes on aarch64, ia64, powerpc,
>> > and s390x.  This patch disables the xfails for those targets.
>> 
>> As I'd mentioned in PR tree-optimization/78775, the test XPASSes on
>> SPARC, too. 
>> 
>> > Tested on powerpc64-linux {-m32,-m64}.  Is this okay for trunk?
>> [...]
>> > 2017-02-09  Segher Boessenkool  <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
>> >
>> > gcc/testsuite/
>> > 	PR testsuite/79356
>> > 	* gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c: Don't xfail on aarch64, ia64, powerpc,
>> > 	or s390x.
>> 
>> TBH, I'd strongly prefer to have a proper analysis instead of just
>> un-xfail-ing the test on an ever growing apparently random list of
>> targets.
>
> Yeah, I agree.  I thought it was just another test that stopped failing,
> but it seems to fail in two ways now, making the testcase succeed?
> Lovely.  Please consider this patch withdrawn.

I just noticed that nothing has happened at all in a month, so anything
is better than the tests XPASSing on a number of targets.

So the patch is ok for mainline with sparc*-*-* added to the target
lists and a reference to PR testsuite/79356 in the comment.

I'd still be very grateful if Martin could have a look what's really
going on here, though.

Thanks.
        Rainer

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]