This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH, rs6000] Fix PR79261 (vec_xxpermdi is not endian-sensitive)


Hi,

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79261 records that the interface
vec_xxpermdi isn't implemented in a bi-endian fashion; instead, it produces
results appropriate for big-endian vector element numbering even when run on
a little endian machine.  This is not part of the "official vector API" from
the ELFv2 ABI document, but should still have appropriate bi-endian behavior.

The problem appears to have arisen because some of GCC's internal usages of 
the xxpermdi instruction wanted to use them in big-endian form, which is 
natural to the original hardware instruction.  The define_expand used for this
(vsx_xxpermdi_<mode>) is also the one that is used for the built-in forms.
Since these two uses require different semantics, I've created a new
vsx_xxpermdi_<mode>_be define_expand to be used for the internal uses, and
re-directed those usages there.  That version retains the original semantics,
while the semantics for the built-ins are changed to be endian-sensitive.

I've added a runtime test to verify that the vec_xxpermdi intrinsics produce
correct results for the various vector modes in both big- and little-endian
environments.

Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64[le]-unknown-linux-gnu with no regressions
in either environment.  Is this ok for trunk, and after a suitable period, for
backport to GCC 5 and 6?

Thanks,
Bill


[gcc]

2017-02-16  Bill Schmidt  <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

	PR target/79261
	* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_expand_ternop_builtin): Add
	support for CODE_FOR_vsx_xxpermdi_v2d[fi]_be.
	* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (reload_gpr_from_vsx<mode>): Call
	generator for vsx_xxpermdi_<mode>_be.
	* config/rs6000/vsx.md (vsx_xxpermdi_<mode>): Remove logic to
	force big-endian semantics.
	(vsx_xxpermdi_<mode>_be): New define_expand with same
	implementation as previous version of vsx_xxpermdi_<mode>.

[gcc/testsuite]

2017-02-16  Bill Schmidt  <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

	PR target/79261
	* gcc.target/powerpc/vec-xxpermdi.c: New file.


Index: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c	(revision 245490)
+++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c	(working copy)
@@ -15436,6 +15436,8 @@ rs6000_expand_ternop_builtin (enum insn_code icode
     }
   else if (icode == CODE_FOR_vsx_xxpermdi_v2df
            || icode == CODE_FOR_vsx_xxpermdi_v2di
+           || icode == CODE_FOR_vsx_xxpermdi_v2df_be
+           || icode == CODE_FOR_vsx_xxpermdi_v2di_be
            || icode == CODE_FOR_vsx_xxsldwi_v16qi
            || icode == CODE_FOR_vsx_xxsldwi_v8hi
            || icode == CODE_FOR_vsx_xxsldwi_v4si
Index: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md	(revision 245490)
+++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md	(working copy)
@@ -8419,7 +8419,7 @@
   rtx gpr_lo_reg = gen_lowpart (DFmode, dest);
 
   emit_insn (gen_p8_mfvsrd_3_<mode> (gpr_hi_reg, src));
-  emit_insn (gen_vsx_xxpermdi_<mode> (tmp, src, src, GEN_INT (3)));
+  emit_insn (gen_vsx_xxpermdi_<mode>_be (tmp, src, src, GEN_INT (3)));
   emit_insn (gen_p8_mfvsrd_3_<mode> (gpr_lo_reg, tmp));
   DONE;
 }
Index: gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md	(revision 245490)
+++ gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md	(working copy)
@@ -2461,6 +2461,38 @@
 	  op1 = gen_lowpart (V2DImode, op1);
 	}
     }
+  emit_insn (gen (target, op0, op1, perm0, perm1));
+  DONE;
+})
+
+;; Special version of xxpermdi that retains big-endian semantics.
+(define_expand "vsx_xxpermdi_<mode>_be"
+  [(match_operand:VSX_L 0 "vsx_register_operand" "")
+   (match_operand:VSX_L 1 "vsx_register_operand" "")
+   (match_operand:VSX_L 2 "vsx_register_operand" "")
+   (match_operand:QI 3 "u5bit_cint_operand" "")]
+  "VECTOR_MEM_VSX_P (<MODE>mode)"
+{
+  rtx target = operands[0];
+  rtx op0 = operands[1];
+  rtx op1 = operands[2];
+  int mask = INTVAL (operands[3]);
+  rtx perm0 = GEN_INT ((mask >> 1) & 1);
+  rtx perm1 = GEN_INT ((mask & 1) + 2);
+  rtx (*gen) (rtx, rtx, rtx, rtx, rtx);
+
+  if (<MODE>mode == V2DFmode)
+    gen = gen_vsx_xxpermdi2_v2df_1;
+  else
+    {
+      gen = gen_vsx_xxpermdi2_v2di_1;
+      if (<MODE>mode != V2DImode)
+	{
+	  target = gen_lowpart (V2DImode, target);
+	  op0 = gen_lowpart (V2DImode, op0);
+	  op1 = gen_lowpart (V2DImode, op1);
+	}
+    }
   /* In little endian mode, vsx_xxpermdi2_<mode>_1 will perform a
      transformation we don't want; it is necessary for
      rs6000_expand_vec_perm_const_1 but not for this use.  So we
@@ -3870,7 +3902,7 @@
     {
       rtx op1 = operands[1];
       rtx v4si_tmp = gen_reg_rtx (V4SImode);
-      emit_insn (gen_vsx_xxpermdi_v4si (v4si_tmp, op1, op1, const1_rtx));
+      emit_insn (gen_vsx_xxpermdi_v4si_be (v4si_tmp, op1, op1, const1_rtx));
       operands[1] = v4si_tmp;
       operands[3] = GEN_INT (12 - INTVAL (operands[3]));
     }
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-xxpermdi.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-xxpermdi.c	(nonexistent)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-xxpermdi.c	(working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+/* { dg-do run { target { powerpc64*-*-* && vsx_hw } } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mvsx" } */
+
+/* Added for PR79261 to test that vec_xxpermdi works correctly for
+   both BE and LE targets.  */
+
+#include <altivec.h>
+void abort (void);
+
+vector double vdx = { 0.0, 1.0 };
+vector double vdy = { 2.0, 3.0 };
+vector double vdz;
+
+vector signed long long vsllx = { 0, 1 };
+vector signed long long vslly = { 2, 3 };
+vector signed long long vsllz;
+
+vector float vfx = { 0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 };
+vector float vfy = { 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0 };
+vector float vfz;
+
+vector signed int vsix = { 0, 1, 2, 3 };
+vector signed int vsiy = { 4, 5, 6, 7 };
+vector signed int vsiz;
+
+vector signed short vssx = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 };
+vector signed short vssy = { 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 };
+vector signed short vssz;
+
+vector signed char vscx = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
+			    8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 };
+vector signed char vscy = { 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23,
+			    24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 };
+vector signed char vscz;
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  vdz = vec_xxpermdi (vdx, vdy, 0b01);
+  if (vdz[0] != 0.0 || vdz[1] != 3.0)
+    abort ();
+
+  vsllz = vec_xxpermdi (vsllx, vslly, 0b10);
+  if (vsllz[0] != 1 || vsllz[1] != 2)
+    abort ();
+
+  vfz = vec_xxpermdi (vfx, vfy, 0b01);
+  if (vfz[0] != 0.0 || vfz[1] != 1.0 || vfz[2] != 6.0 || vfz[3] != 7.0)
+    abort ();
+
+  vsiz = vec_xxpermdi (vsix, vsiy, 0b10);
+  if (vsiz[0] != 2 || vsiz[1] != 3 || vsiz[2] != 4 || vsiz[3] != 5)
+    abort ();
+
+  vssz = vec_xxpermdi (vssx, vssy, 0b00);
+  if (vssz[0] != 0 || vssz[1] != 1 || vssz[2] != 2 || vssz[3] != 3
+      || vssz[4] != 8 || vssz[5] != 9 || vssz[6] != 10 || vssz[7] != 11)
+    abort ();
+
+  vscz = vec_xxpermdi (vscx, vscy, 0b11);
+  if (vscz[0] != 8 || vscz[1] != 9 || vscz[2] != 10 || vscz[3] != 11
+      || vscz[4] != 12 || vscz[5] != 13 || vscz[6] != 14 || vscz[7] != 15
+      || vscz[8] != 24 || vscz[9] != 25 || vscz[10] != 26 || vscz[11] != 27
+      || vscz[12] != 28 || vscz[13] != 29 || vscz[14] != 30 || vscz[15] != 31)
+    abort ();
+
+  return 0;
+}


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]