This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH][GIMPLE FE] Add parsing of MEM_REFs
On Thu, 12 Jan 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Well, we need some suffix that will not clash with C++ mandated udlits
> very soon, it is already bad that i and Q suffixes are problematic.
> By sN, did you mean s128 or literally sN?
> I've googled around a little bit and only found comments about
> 1ui64 and 1i64 suffixes, so that would mean accepting instead of l/L
> i128 or I128.
i128 and I128 seem reasonable as a user-visible C extension (they could of
course be mixed in any order with u, U for unsigned, and with i, I, j, J
for imaginary numbers). I don't know what's appropriate for C++.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com