This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Machine-readable RTL dumps: print_rtx_function


On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:36:29AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 09/29/2016 11:25 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> >On 09/29/2016 07:47 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> >>This patch adds a new function, print_rtx_function, intended for use
> >>for generating function dumps suitable for parsing by the RTL frontend,
> >>but also intended to be human-readable, and human-authorable.
> >
> >>     (note 1 0 4 (nil) NOTE_INSN_DELETED)
> >>     (note 4 1 2 2 [bb 2] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
> >>     (insn 2 4 3 2 (set (mem/c:SI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 82
> >>virtual-stack-vars)
> >>                         (const_int -4 [0xfffffffffffffffc])) [1 i+0
> >>S4 A32])
> >>                 (reg:SI 5 di [ i ])) t.c:2 -1
> >>              (nil))
> >
> >I think it might be a good idea to get rid of redundant information like
> >insn numbers for such a dump format. But that can be left for followup
> >patches.
> I would make the same suggestion.  The insn # and backend pattern name 
> (if any) should be omitted in machine-readable dump format.  I'm fine 
> with that as a follow-up as well.

You need the insn id for (at least) code_label.


Segher


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]