This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 07/22/16 07:46, Martin Liška wrote:
Hi. As described in the PR, current numbering scheme in gcov-io.h would overflow in couple of years. Thus, I'm suggesting to switch from: [major][minor/10][minor%10][release_status] to: [major/10][major%10][minor][release_status]
If I'm reading that right, although we'll have a strange collating order that won't match release ordering, we won't get collisions (because the minor version never got above 9).
Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
Yes thanks. I was wondering when gcc's new version numbering would impact this ident.
nathan
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |