This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix ICE with statement expression (PR c++/71728)
- From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 14:12:22 -0400
- Subject: Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix ICE with statement expression (PR c++/71728)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20160721160919.GG7387@tucnak.redhat.com>
OK.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It is true that parsing should make sure that GOTO_EXPRs (other than
> break/continue) aren't allowed in constant expression contexts, but
> potential_constant_expression_1 may be called (with tf_none) also
> on arbitrary code either for warning purposes, or (very recent change)
> also in cp_fully_fold, usually from maybe_constant_value.
>
> So asserting they don't appear doesn't work.
>
> Fixed thusly, alternatively we could assert that (flags & tf_error) == 0
> before returning false.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk/6.2?
>
> 2016-07-21 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR c++/71728
> * constexpr.c (potential_constant_expression_1) <case GOTO_EXPR>:
> Replace assert with test, return false if the goto isn't break
> or continue. Formatting fix.
>
> * g++.dg/other/pr71728.C: New test.
>
> --- gcc/cp/constexpr.c.jj 2016-07-21 08:59:50.000000000 +0200
> +++ gcc/cp/constexpr.c 2016-07-21 12:05:16.828618186 +0200
> @@ -5289,10 +5289,12 @@ potential_constant_expression_1 (tree t,
> case GOTO_EXPR:
> {
> tree *target = &TREE_OPERAND (t, 0);
> - /* Gotos representing break and continue are OK; we should have
> - rejected other gotos in parsing. */
> - gcc_assert (breaks (target) || continues (target));
> - return true;
> + /* Gotos representing break and continue are OK. */
> + if (breaks (target) || continues (target))
> + return true;
> + if (flags & tf_error)
> + error ("%<goto%> is not a constant-expression");
> + return false;
> }
>
> default:
> @@ -5300,7 +5302,7 @@ potential_constant_expression_1 (tree t,
> return false;
>
> sorry ("unexpected AST of kind %s", get_tree_code_name (TREE_CODE (t)));
> - gcc_unreachable();
> + gcc_unreachable ();
> return false;
> }
> #undef RECUR
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/pr71728.C.jj 2016-07-21 12:13:31.686461551 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/other/pr71728.C 2016-07-21 12:14:46.974524876 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +// PR c++/71728
> +// { dg-do compile }
> +// { dg-options "-std=gnu++14 -Wall" }
> +
> +int
> +foo ()
> +{
> + if (({ goto test; test: 1; }) != 1)
> + return 1;
> + return 2;
> +}
>
> Jakub