This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Add priority_queue::value_compare (LWG 2684)

On 24/05/16 17:02 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
	* include/bits/stl_queue.h (priority_queue::value_compare): Define.

This is only Tentatively Ready but I don't think there's any harm in
making the change now. Libc++ have been shipping this for years,
without realising it wasn't actually in the standard :-)

Tested x86_64, committed to trunk.

Now that the issue has been resolved I've documented it and
regenerated the docs.

Committed to trunk.

commit d86801688332d159d49bc55b7cd16d24ef3be423
Author: redi <redi@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date:   Wed Jul 20 18:22:05 2016 +0000

    Document LWG DR 2684 status and regenerate libstdc++ manual
    	* doc/xml/manual/intro.xml: Document DR 2684 status.
    	* doc/html/*: Regenerate.
    git-svn-id: svn+ssh:// 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/intro.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/intro.xml
index c6b0656..a5e0a3b 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/intro.xml
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/intro.xml
@@ -1052,6 +1052,12 @@ requirements of the license of GCC.
     <listitem><para>Divide by the object type.
+    <varlistentry><term><link xmlns:xlink=""; xlink:href="../ext/lwg-defects.html#2684">2684</link>:
+       <emphasis><code>priority_queue</code> lacking comparator typedef
+       </emphasis>
+    </term>
+    <listitem><para>Define the <code>value_compare</code> typedef.
+    </para></listitem></varlistentry>

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]