This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH]: Use HOST_WIDE_INT_{,M}1{,U} some more

On 07/20/2016 02:25 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
2016-07-19 14:46 GMT+02:00 Uros Bizjak <>:
The result of exercises with sed in gcc/ directory.

Some more conversions:

2016-07-20  Uros Bizjak  <>

    * cse.c: Use HOST_WIDE_INT_M1 instead of ~(HOST_WIDE_INT) 0.
    * combine.c: Use HOST_WIDE_INT_M1U instead of
    ~(unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) 0.
    * double-int.h: Ditto.
    * dse.c: Ditto.
    * dwarf2asm.c:Ditto.
    * expmed.c: Ditto.
    * genmodes.c: Ditto.
    * match.pd: Ditto.
    * read-rtl.c: Ditto.
    * tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c: Ditto.
    * tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c: Ditto.
    * tree-vect-generic.c: Ditto.
    * tree-vect-patterns.c: Ditto.
    * tree.c: Ditto.

Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu {,-m32}.

OK for mainline?

I think this is a good set of changes which makes the code easier to read. Can I impose one additional requirement, building before/after and verifying that all the object files are identical? If you do this, these and all other similar changes are preapproved.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]