This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Merge switch statements in tree-cfgcleanup

From: Marc Glisse <marc dot glisse at inria dot fr>
To: Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt at redhat dot com>
Cc: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 12:22:32 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Merge switch statements in tree-cfgcleanup
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <96c4b009-0b69-2f7a-1fad-d9ae4331b017@redhat.com> <CAFiYyc0oG1tmOa5PiY+1C=b_3f0Ba2Y_nytco6W1xMr0dMu62g@mail.gmail.com> <c5b0644f-64b6-3b48-9f81-4300bbd9d65c@redhat.com> <CAFiYyc2dFSJ+-uMOsvLxUu2cyd_5xDfXb9qZnVruVj0qGBkvGA@mail.gmail.com> <6e952a57-b92b-4fde-700c-f08b8bdec9cc@redhat.com>
Reply-to: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org

On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Bernd Schmidt wrote:

On 07/19/2016 12:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:

I saw walks over stmts of a BB.  IMHO that's a no-go.


Only to find the first or last nondebug one. Is that unacceptable?


Does gsi_start_nondebug_after_labels_bb not fit?

--
Marc Glisse

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Merge switch statements in tree-cfgcleanup
  - From: Bernd Schmidt

References:
- Merge switch statements in tree-cfgcleanup
  - From: Bernd Schmidt
- Re: Merge switch statements in tree-cfgcleanup
  - From: Richard Biener
- Re: Merge switch statements in tree-cfgcleanup
  - From: Bernd Schmidt
- Re: Merge switch statements in tree-cfgcleanup
  - From: Richard Biener
- Re: Merge switch statements in tree-cfgcleanup
  - From: Bernd Schmidt

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]