This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Implement -Wswitch-fallthrough


On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:23:30PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 01:18:02PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > I explained why supporting the classic lint style comment wouldn't fly.
> > 
> > Not convincing, it worked fine for 30+ years of lints.
> 
> So how can the compiler handle
> /* Never ever fall through here */
> ?

It can't.  But it perhaps could handle a couple of documented most common
comment styles, perhaps only if followed by break token, and turn say
/* FALLTHROUGH */
break
(and say:
/* FALL THROUGH */
/* FALLTHRU */
/* FALL THRU */
/*-fallthrough*/
/* Fallthrough */
/* Fall through */
/* Fallthru */
/* Fall thru */
/* fallthrough */
/* fall through */
/* fallthru */
/* fall thru */
// FALLTHROUGH
// FALL THROUGH
// FALLTHRU
// FALL THRU
//-fallthrough
// Fallthrough
// Fall through
// Fallthru
// Fall thru
// fallthrough
// fall through
// fallthru
// fall thru
)
into:
#pragma GCC fallthrough
break
and make sure that if the pragma appears outside of switch or say in
if (...)
#pragma GCC fallthrough
break
and similar spots, then it is actually ignored, rather than affecting the
parsed code.
Supporting also __builtin_fallthrough (); and [[fallthrough]] is desirable,
the transformation of the above comments into the pragma should be
controllable by some separate switch?

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]