This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix Fortran DO loop fallback


> On Jul 11, 2016, at 7:44 AM, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On 07/08/2016 08:26 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hello
>> 
>> Following patch fixes fallout caused by the patch set:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2016-07/msg00097.html
>> 
>> Ready after it finished regression tests?
>> Thanks,
>> Martin
>> 
>> 
>> 0001-Fix-Fortran-DO-loop-fallback.patch
>> 
>> 
>> From c5dd7ad62f795cce560c7f1bb8767b7ed9298d8a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: marxin <mliska@suse.cz>
>> Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 15:51:54 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] Fix Fortran DO loop fallback
>> 
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>> 
>> 2016-07-08  Martin Liska  <mliska@suse.cz>
>> 
>> 	* gfortran.dg/ldist-1.f90: Update expected dump scan.
>> 	* gfortran.dg/pr42108.f90: Likewise.
>> 	* gfortran.dg/vect/pr62283.f: Likewise.
> Shouldn't ldist-1.f90 be scan-tree-dump-not?  It seems like you change it from that just last week, but it wasn't mentioned in the ChangeLog.
> 
> OK with that change.

A gentle reminder, fortran patches should include the fortran list...


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]