This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 0/9] separate shrink-wrapping

On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 09:16:03AM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> As far as I understand the idea, there are a number of target-specific
> things that are to be done during a function call, and the optimization
> tries to detect which of optimize each of these separately.
> Some synonyms and near-synonyms for these "things":
>   aspect
>   component
>   concern
>   duty
>   element
>   facet
>   factor
>   item
>   part
>   piece
>   portion
>   responsibility
> and I suppose "shrink_wrap_part" is shorter than
> "shrink_wrap_component".

The reason I called it "concern" is that this isn't dealing with the
prologue/epilogue divided neatly into separate insns.  The generic code
only deals with what basic blocks will have what concerns the prologue
deals with, dealt with.  The target code then worries about what code
to write for that.  "concerns" does not map 1-1 to parts of the prologue,
in the general case.  (A very simple example: the arm load/store pair

But component is abstract enough I think.

> (Yeah, I'm bike-shedding; sorry)



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]