This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Determine more IVs to be non-overflowing
> On Wed, 6 Jul 2016, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > Jan Hubicka <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > >
> > > > Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, OK?
> > > >
> > > > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-14.c: new testcase.
> > >
> > > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-14.c scan-tree-dump-not ivopts "Overflowness wrto loop niter:\tOverflow"
> > Aha, this is wrong version of testcase. The scan-tree-dump-not doesn't match
> > until we resolve decreasing unsigned iv variables as non-overlapping. I will
> > test dropping that pattern for now. Sorry for that.
> But did you test the patch? You should have noticed this during your
> own testing...
Yeah, I managed to keep unrelated change to ivopts in the tree that made the testcase
to pass. Sorry for that.