This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [ARM][testsuite] neon-testgen.ml removal
- From: Christophe Lyon <christophe dot lyon at linaro dot org>
- To: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 12:55:23 +0200
- Subject: Re: [ARM][testsuite] neon-testgen.ml removal
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAKdteOb2k-LVYFvvd5RFi62uJ4aj7rch6UY5z2c+LKu-SC+WoA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKdteOb66AuMa0ckiY2FU9cFd2u3xseKaFe-Kan+_Yqugaj5Gw@mail.gmail.com>
ping ^2 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01615.html
On 27 June 2016 at 12:54, Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org> wrote:
> ping?
>
> On 22 June 2016 at 17:52, Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a new attempt at removing neon-testgen.ml and generated files.
>>
>> Compared to my previous version several months ago:
>> - I have recently added testcases to make sure we do not lose coverage
>> as described in
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02922.html
>> - I now also remove neon.ml as requested by Kyrylo in
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg01664.html, and moved
>> the remaining hand-written tests up to gcc.target/arm.
>>
>> Doing this, I had to slightly update vst1Q_laneu64-1.c because it's
>> now compiled with more pedantic flags and there was a signed/unsigned
>> char buffer pointer mismatch.
>>
>> Sorry, I had to compress the patch, otherwise it's too large and rejected
>> by the list server.
>>
>> OK?
>>
>> Christophe