This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: tuple move constructor
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>
- To: Marc Glisse <marc dot glisse at inria dot fr>
- Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 16:37:03 +0100
- Subject: Re: tuple move constructor
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 02 dot 1604202233060 dot 21596 at laptop-mg dot saclay dot inria dot fr> <CAH6eHdRO6kfWqb5K_Nr5WYvHCJNNyQeKSN8VF5c-Ov32HOpU4g at mail dot gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 02 dot 1604211902320 dot 27091 at laptop-mg dot saclay dot inria dot fr> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 02 dot 1605232038220 dot 30609 at laptop-mg dot saclay dot inria dot fr> <20160525135413 dot GI14158 at redhat dot com>
On 25/05/16 14:54 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 23/05/16 20:39 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
Ping
(re-attaching, I just added a one-line comment before the tag class
as asked by Ville)
This is OK for trunk - thanks.
On second thoughts - does this change the passing conventions for
std::tuple if it gets a trivial move ctor?