This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, PR rtl-optimization/71148] Avoid cleanup_cfg called with invalidated dominance info
- From: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: Ilya Enkovich <enkovich dot gnu at gmail dot com>
- Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 12:39:21 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, PR rtl-optimization/71148] Avoid cleanup_cfg called with invalidated dominance info
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20160518161703 dot GA31178 at msticlxl57 dot ims dot intel dot com> <CAFiYyc0rGrk7wq-MzqHt3uE18HRodgQuuJJtdow2MuJt8fdaxA at mail dot gmail dot com> <20160519103429 dot GB31178 at msticlxl57 dot ims dot intel dot com>
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Ilya Enkovich <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19 May 09:57, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Ilya Enkovich <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > This patch resolves PR71148 by releasing dominance info before
>> > cleanup_cfg calls to avoid attempts to fixup invalid dominance
>> > info.
>> >
>> > Dominance info handling in cleanup_cfg looks weird though. It
>> > tries to fix it but can invalidate it at the same time (PR71084).
>> > We should probably do something with that.
>> >
>> > Tracker is P1 and this patch may be OK solution for now.
>> >
>> > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk?
>>
>> Hum... all this dancing with CSE looks bogus to me. Does CSE itself
>> need dominance info? If not then unconditionally free it at its start.
>>
>> Richard.
>>
>
> Here it is. OK if testing pass?
>
> Thanks,
> Ilya
> --
> gcc/
>
> 2016-05-19 Ilya Enkovich <ilya.enkovich@intel.com>
>
> * cse.c (cse_main): Free dominance info.
> (rest_of_handle_cse): Don't free dominance info.
> (rest_of_handle_cse2): Likewise.
> (rest_of_handle_cse_after_global_opts): Likewise.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>
> 2016-05-19 Ilya Enkovich <ilya.enkovich@intel.com>
>
> * gcc.dg/pr71148.c: New test.
>
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cse.c b/gcc/cse.c
> index 322e352..84082fb 100644
> --- a/gcc/cse.c
> +++ b/gcc/cse.c
> @@ -6669,6 +6669,11 @@ cse_main (rtx_insn *f ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, int nregs)
> int *rc_order = XNEWVEC (int, last_basic_block_for_fn (cfun));
> int i, n_blocks;
>
> + /* CSE doesn't use dominance info but can invalidate it in different ways.
> + For simplicity free dominance info here. */
> + if (dom_info_available_p (CDI_DOMINATORS))
> + free_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
Just call free_dominance_info unconditionally.
Ok with that change (if it passes testing).
Richard.
> +
> df_set_flags (DF_LR_RUN_DCE);
> df_note_add_problem ();
> df_analyze ();
> @@ -7568,9 +7573,6 @@ rest_of_handle_cse (void)
> else if (tem == 1 || optimize > 1)
> cse_cfg_altered |= cleanup_cfg (0);
>
> - if (cse_cfg_altered && dom_info_available_p (CDI_DOMINATORS))
> - free_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -7640,9 +7642,6 @@ rest_of_handle_cse2 (void)
> else if (tem == 1)
> cse_cfg_altered |= cleanup_cfg (0);
>
> - if (cse_cfg_altered && dom_info_available_p (CDI_DOMINATORS))
> - free_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
> -
> cse_not_expected = 1;
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -7717,9 +7716,6 @@ rest_of_handle_cse_after_global_opts (void)
> else if (tem == 1)
> cse_cfg_altered |= cleanup_cfg (0);
>
> - if (cse_cfg_altered && dom_info_available_p (CDI_DOMINATORS))
> - free_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
> -
> flag_cse_follow_jumps = save_cfj;
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr71148.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr71148.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6aa4920
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr71148.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
> +/* PR rtl-optimization/71148 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O3 -funroll-loops" } */
> +
> +int rh, ok, kq, fu;
> +
> +void
> +js (int cs)
> +{
> + rh = fu;
> + if (fu != 0)
> + {
> + cs /= 3;
> + if (cs <= 0)
> + {
> + int z9;
> + for (z9 = 0; z9 < 2; ++z9)
> + {
> + z9 += cs;
> + ok += z9;
> + fu += ok;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void
> +vy (int s3)
> +{
> + int yo, g2 = 0;
> + sd:
> + js (g2);
> + for (yo = 0; yo < 2; ++yo)
> + {
> + if (fu != 0)
> + goto sd;
> + kq += (s3 != (g2 ? s3 : 0));
> + for (s3 = 0; s3 < 72; ++s3)
> + g2 *= (~0 - 1);
> + g2 -= yo;
> + }
> + for (fu = 0; fu < 18; ++fu)
> + for (yo = 0; yo < 17; ++yo)
> + if (g2 < 0)
> + goto sd;
> +}