Re: [C++ Patch] PR 70466 ("ICE on invalid code in tree check: expected constructor, have parm_decl in convert_like_real...")

[Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>]

Hi,

On 18/05/2016 16:08, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 05/17/2016 05:57 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> > On 17/05/2016 20:15, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On 05/17/2016 04:47 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> > > > ... alternately, if the substance of my patchlet is right, we could
> > > > simplify a bit the logic per the below.
> > >
> > > Here's a well-formed variant that was accepted by 4.5.  Does your
> > > patch fix it?  I also think with your patch we can drop the C++11
> > > check, since list-initialization doesn't exist in C++98.
> > Oh nice, the new testcase indeed passes with my patch. However, removing
> > completely C++11 check causes a regression in c++98 mode for
> > init/explicit1.C, we start warning for it:
>
> Ah, that makes sense.  Your patch is OK, then.
Committed. Since you noticed that actually this is a regression, please 
let me know in which branches we want to fix it, I would guess at least 
gcc-6-branch too.

Thanks,
Paolo.