This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Update gmp/mpfr/mpc in-tree versions
- From: Richard Biener <rguenther at suse dot de>
- To: Bernd Edlinger <bernd dot edlinger at hotmail dot de>
- Cc: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Marc Glisse <marc dot glisse at inria dot fr>; Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>; Jonathan Wakely" <jwakely at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 08:50:38 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update gmp/mpfr/mpc in-tree versions
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <AM4PR07MB1571E7BDED31B7C146A0BC4CE4630 at AM4PR07MB1571 dot eurprd07 dot prod dot outlook dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 20 dot 1604262007090 dot 2787 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <HE1PR07MB15805C6A09E3DAC3380023BEE4640 at HE1PR07MB1580 dot eurprd07 dot prod dot outlook dot com> <alpine dot LSU dot 2 dot 11 dot 1604280903150 dot 13384 at t29 dot fhfr dot qr> <AM4PR07MB157126273516C6B5E78F4052E4650 at AM4PR07MB1571 dot eurprd07 dot prod dot outlook dot com> <alpine dot LSU dot 2 dot 11 dot 1604281432290 dot 13384 at t29 dot fhfr dot qr> <AM4PR07MB157123EEAF98313960EF95D9E4650 at AM4PR07MB1571 dot eurprd07 dot prod dot outlook dot com> <alpine dot LSU dot 2 dot 11 dot 1604281627080 dot 13384 at t29 dot fhfr dot qr> <AM4PR07MB1571979A7F91B70C245E60E0E4650 at AM4PR07MB1571 dot eurprd07 dot prod dot outlook dot com> <alpine dot LSU dot 2 dot 11 dot 1604290946190 dot 13384 at t29 dot fhfr dot qr> <AM4PR07MB157159A4E42EA903E2278860E4660 at AM4PR07MB1571 dot eurprd07 dot prod dot outlook dot com>
On Fri, 29 Apr 2016, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 29.04.2016 09:46, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Apr 2016, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> >
> >> On 28.04.2016 16:29, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Another option would be to try if mini-gmp is enough for our
> >>> (in-tree) use and what the performance impact would be if we'd
> >>> use that (in-tree).
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yes, we would certainly never need more than that subset.
> >>
> >> But I don't see how mpfr can be built with mini-gmp.
> >> I tried to and failed early in mpfr/configure.
> >> Any ideas?
> >
> > No idea - it of course breaks down if mpfr cannot work with mini-gmp.
> >
>
> Yes, that's how it looks like.
>
> Frankly speaking, I think we should start testing with 6.1.0
> (with -DNO_ASM of course, but that should be safe at least)
> and if anything goes wrong, we can still try to get it fixed in 6.1.1,
> as long as it is not yet released.
Fair enough - I'm fine with your latest patch then unless somebody
objects soon. Does it fix any reported PRs? If so, please mention
them in the ChangeLog entries.
I've up-lodaed GMP 6.1.0 as well now.
Thanks,
Richard.