This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Allow redefinition of libcilkrts debug macros


Hi Rainer!

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:58:25 +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> > On 04/26/2016 08:04 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> >> When working on a couple of Cilk Plus issues lately (PRs target/60290,
> >> target/68945), I noticed that you have to modify the libcilkplus sources
> >> to enable various debugging output.  This seems silly, and the following
> >> patch allows defining them from the command line.
> >>
> >> Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.12 and sparc-sun-solaris2.12.
> >>
> >> Ok for mainline?
> >>
> >> 	Rainer
> >>
> >>
> >> 2016-04-07  Rainer Orth  <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
> >>
> >> 	* runtime/except-gcc.cpp (DEBUG_EXCEPTIONS): Allow redefinition.
> >> 	* runtime/cilk_fiber.h (FIBER_DEBUG): Likewise.
> >> 	* runtime/scheduler.h (REDPAR_DEBUG): Likewise.
> > Ilya will have to chime in here -- we're a downstream consumer of the Cilk+
> > runtime.  So these patches need to go into Intel's tree first, then Ilya
> > can bring them into the GCC tree.
> 
> I suspected that much.  It would be good to have a libcilkrts/README.gcc
> describing the rules which changes can go into the gcc tree directly,
> which need to go upstream first, and how.  libo and libsanitizer already
> have this.

Could you please submit your patch to <www.cilkplus.org/submit-cilk-contribution>?
All patches for libcilkrts/* should go there first in order to avoid possible
license issues, or possible losses during the merge.

Thanks,
  -- Ilya


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]