This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] PR target/70155: Use SSE for TImode load/store


On 04/26/2016 03:17 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Uros Bizjak wrote:

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:47 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 7:18 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:51 PM, H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> wrote:
Tested on Linux/x86-64.  OK for trunk?

+  /* FIXME: Since the CSE pass may change dominance info, which isn't
+     expected by the fwprop pass, call free_dominance_info to
+     invalidate dominance info.  Otherwise, the fwprop pass may crash
+     when dominance info is changed.  */
+  if (TARGET_64BIT)
+    free_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
+

Please resolve the above problem first, target-dependent sources are
not the place to apply band-aids for middle-end problems. The thread
with the proposed fix died in [1].

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-03/msg00143.html

free_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS) has been called in other
places to avoid this middle-end issue.   I don't know when the middle-end
will be fixed.  I don't think this target optimization should be penalized by
the middle-end issue.

Let's ask Richard if he is OK with the workaround...

Well, it's ultimately your call (it's a workaround in the target).

Of course I'd like to see the underlying issue fixed and the
workarounds in "other places" be removed.
Agreed.  It's fundamentally papering over a problem elsewhere.

jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]