This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [wwwdocs,Java] java/index.html -- fix formatting on gcc.gnu.org
- From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, Andrew Hughes <gnu dot andrew at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 12:34:35 +0100
- Subject: Re: [wwwdocs,Java] java/index.html -- fix formatting on gcc.gnu.org
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <alpine dot LSU dot 2 dot 20 dot 1604091902290 dot 9804 at anthias dot pfeifer dot com> <1384476119 dot 20974246 dot 1460325515495 dot JavaMail dot zimbra at redhat dot com> <alpine dot LSU dot 2 dot 20 dot 1604162229240 dot 9804 at anthias dot pfeifer dot com>
On 16/04/16 21:31, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>> That said, looking at the page, and how since 2005 nearly all changes
>>> have been maintainance ones from me, is it really worthwhile keeping
>>> this (short of historic reasons)?
>> I guess the next news will be the removal of GCJ during the
>> GCC 7 development period, so its remaining shelf life should
>> be limited anyway.
>
> Soo, GCC 6 has branched -- would it make sense for you guys to
> start this removal?
Sounds good. OTOH, I don't think there's any great hurry.
> Somewhat related, any concerns if I were to remove
> https://gcc.gnu.org/java/status.html now?
>
> ("Status of GCJ as of GCC 3.2" _really_ is rather old.)
It's so old that I don't think it's of any use. However, I wonder if
it might make more sense to at least have a page saying that GCJ is
gone.
Andrew.