This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Additional tests for 69987, 69989, 69740
- From: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: vogt at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 13:43:40 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Additional tests for 69987, 69989, 69740
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <56D5C1CF dot 1050007 at redhat dot com> <20160302120044 dot GA11641 at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Dominik Vogt <vogt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:22:39AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
>> Two additional regression tests for problems exposed by the 69740
>> patches. They tickle a different path than the test HJ already
>> checked in. Obviously the idea is to have these in place so that
>> when we attack 69740 again, we don't regress these issues.
>>
>> Installed on the trunk after verifying they PASS on the trunk.
>
> This on fails on s390x with -m31 (but works with -m64). (Without
> trying it I assume it also fails on s390).
>
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr69987.f90
>
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr69987.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
> Excess errors:
> f951: Warning: -fprefetch-loop-arrays not supported for this target (try -march switches)
>
> Ciao
>
> Dominik ^_^ ^_^
Other testcases simply add -w when using -fprefetch-loop-arrays....
Richard.
> --
>
> Dominik Vogt
> IBM Germany
>