This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH] Remove xfail from thread_local-order2.C.


g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C no longer fail with Glibc-2.18 or
newer since this commit:

  2014-08-01  Zifei Tong  <zifeitong@gmail.com>

     	* libsupc++/atexit_thread.cc (HAVE___CXA_THREAD_ATEXIT_IMPL): Add
     	_GLIBCXX_ prefix to macro.

  git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@213504 138bc75d-0d04-0410-96

https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg02091.html

So, is it time to remove the xfail from the test case?

Ciao

Dominik ^_^  ^_^

-- 

Dominik Vogt
IBM Germany

Attachment: 0001-ChangeLog
Description: Text document

>From 0b0abbd2e6d9d8b6857622065bdcbdde31b5ddb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dominik Vogt <vogt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:54:07 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Remove xfail from thread_local-order2.C.

This should work with Glibc-2.18 or newer.
---
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C
index f8df917..d3351e6 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
 // that isn't reverse order of construction.  We need to move
 // __cxa_thread_atexit into glibc to get this right.
 
-// { dg-do run { xfail *-*-* } }
 // { dg-require-effective-target c++11 }
 // { dg-add-options tls }
 // { dg-require-effective-target tls_runtime }
-- 
2.3.0


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]