This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: regrename/i386: ROP vs df and stack-regs

On 11/27/2015 10:26 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:


+#ifdef STACK_REGS
+	      if (regstack_completed
+		  && REG_P (recog_data.operand[i])
+		  && IN_RANGE (REGNO (recog_data.operand[i]),
+			       FIRST_STACK_REG, LAST_STACK_REG))
+		untracked_operands |= 1 << i;
+#endif

Why not use "op" instead of recog_data.operand[i] here?  Don't this need to be
placed before the conditional call to create_new_chain?


Both good points. Ok with those changes (will retest)?


Bernd
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]