Re: [PATCH] Fix uninitialized src_range within c_expr (Re: libcpp/C FE source range patch committed (r230331))

[David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>]

On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 3:00 PM, David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 13:54 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 3:12 PM, David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 16:24 +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> >> On 11/17/2015 04:13 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 22:34 +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Should c_expr perhaps acquire a constructor so that this problem is
>> >> >> avoided in the future? The whole thing seems somewhat error-prone.
>> >> >
>> >> > I agree that it's error prone, and the ctor approach is what I've been
>> >> > trying for the C++ FE [1] but I suspect that touching that in the C FE
>> >> > would be a much more invasive patch (unless we simply give it a default
>> >> > ctor that makes the src_range be a pair of UNKNOWN_LOCATIONS?).
>> >>
>> >> The UNKNOWN_LOCATIONS pair would have been my approach, yes.
>> >>
>> >> > This case gains a pair of locals: start_loc and end_loc (so that we can
>> >> > track the spelling range whilst retaining the "loc" used for the caret),
>> >> > and I preferred to confine their scope to within the case, hence the
>> >> > extra braced block.  Omitting the braced block leads to:
>> >> > ../../src/gcc/c/c-parser.c:7494:7: error: jump to case label [-fpermissive]
>> >> >    case RID_OFFSETOF:
>> >> >         ^
>> >> > ../../src/gcc/c/c-parser.c:7472:17: error:   crosses initialization of âlocation_t end_locâ
>> >> >        location_t end_loc = c_parser_peek_token (parser)->get_finish ();
>> >> >                   ^
>> >> > etc.
>> >>
>> >> Hmm, odd, I tried placing just the location_t start_loc line into the
>> >> switch and that appeared to compile fine. But I guess this is not a huge
>> >> problem.
>> >> >
>> >> > Is the combination of the 3 patches OK for trunk? (assuming
>> >> > bootstrap&regrest; it's only the braced-init tweak that hasn't been).
>> >>
>> >> Yes.
>> >
>> > Thanks.  I've committed the 3 patches to trunk as r230497, which should
>> > fix the worst of the regressions caused by r230331 seen on AIX.  I'll
>> > continue to investigate as per the discussion above.
>>
>> Hi, David
>>
>> The new stret-1.m Objective C failure on AIX shows the same symptoms.
>> Is there another fix needed for Objective C?
>>
>> #1  0x10016794 in _Z14linemap_lookupP9line_mapsj (set=0x70000000, line=991)
>>     at /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/libcpp/line-map.c:991
>> 991       linemap_assert (line >= LINEMAPS_MACRO_LOWEST_LOCATION (set));
>
> I believe this one is fixed by the patch I posted here:
>  "[PATCH] Fix PR objc/68438 (uninitialized source ranges)"
>    https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02536.html
>
> (it runs cleanly under valgrind on x86_64 with that patch applied)

Yep, thanks.  I missed the follow-on patch.

Thanks, David