This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] g++.dg/init/vbase1.C and g++.dg/cpp/ucn-1.C
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
- To: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana dot radhakrishnan at foss dot arm dot com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 14:41:54 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] g++.dg/init/vbase1.C and g++.dg/cpp/ucn-1.C
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAGWvnynxgVBDfUMKz5qYkjn42RgO8K+mdFSG0-Bmt_4AQ74ztQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <m2oaewubrx dot fsf at linux-m68k dot org> <CAGWvnykq4D+nKTgQZ1=Qig9rqMLC6a5uw7LTciMtP4oEcYeT3g at mail dot gmail dot com>
David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 5:16 AM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> + int c\u0024c; // { dg-error "not valid in an identifier" {
>>> target { powerpc-ibm-aix* } } }
>>
>> FAIL: g++.dg/cpp/ucn-1.C -std=gnu++11 target { powerpc-ibm-aix* } (test for errors, line 12)
>
> Argh. So why isn't it limited to the specified target as the
> documentation implies?
Where does it imply that?
# dg-error regexp comment [{ target/xfail selector } [{.|0|linenum}]]
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."