This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 11/12/2015 12:46 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
I'd prefer not. We will likely run the reducers regularly and each time someone is going to look at this and have to remember that it's dealing with a need that is specific to an out-of-tree port.My port needs the below patch. I think this was reduced by someone on a port that didn’t use some features (TARGET_SHORT_BRANCH_CHEAPER) of tm.h. So, the question is, is this the preferred way to do this? I don’t want to hookize TARGET_SHORT_BRANCH_CHEAPER, which is the other fix. If yes, Ok?
I'd recommend hookizing. Jeff
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |