This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3 PATCH] Make the default constructors of tuple and pair conditionally explicit.

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Ville Voutilainen <ville dot voutilainen at gmail dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 22:07:05 +0100
Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH] Make the default constructors of tuple and pair conditionally explicit.
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <CAFk2RUaUjmpsbvQdonwR2SaqjAMHk2tjaBrKjM1Gy8jmJg1Ufg at mail dot gmail dot com> <56377F0B dot 7070209 at oracle dot com> <CAFk2RUbWcCeQWdqeoR2x+W2nSgMR9fsGKZQAtFw6eXz8U6+MJA at mail dot gmail dot com> <5637B784 dot 6020403 at oracle dot com> <CAFk2RUY67uRTZTTZ+B3GpqgSr+jp8Own8S4zAss=dd0L=cvWwg at mail dot gmail dot com>

Hi,

On 11/02/2015 09:20 PM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:

On 2 November 2015 at 21:20, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wrote:

Can we follow the terse style already used elsewhere (eg,
__is_direct_constructible_new_safe) thus directly inherit from __and_ and
avoid explicit integral_constant? Otherwise patch looks good to me.


Sure. Tested again on Linux-PPC64, tests adjusted due to line changes,
Changelog entry updated to have a correct date on it.

Great, thanks a lot. Thinking more about this detail, I wonder if weshould therefore apply the below too? Anything I'm missing?


Paolo.

///////////////

Attachment: p
Description: Text document

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v3 PATCH] Make the default constructors of tuple and pair conditionally explicit.
  - From: Ville Voutilainen
- Re: [v3 PATCH] Make the default constructors of tuple and pair conditionally explicit.
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

References:
- [v3 PATCH] Make the default constructors of tuple and pair conditionally explicit.
  - From: Ville Voutilainen
- Re: [v3 PATCH] Make the default constructors of tuple and pair conditionally explicit.
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [v3 PATCH] Make the default constructors of tuple and pair conditionally explicit.
  - From: Ville Voutilainen
- Re: [v3 PATCH] Make the default constructors of tuple and pair conditionally explicit.
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [v3 PATCH] Make the default constructors of tuple and pair conditionally explicit.
  - From: Ville Voutilainen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]