This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Bulk] [OpenACC 0/7] host_data construct
- From: Julian Brown <julian at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: James Norris <jnorris at codesourcery dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Nathan Sidwell <Nathan_Sidwell at mentor dot com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 18:33:39 +0000
- Subject: Re: [Bulk] [OpenACC 0/7] host_data construct
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <56293476 dot 5020801 at codesourcery dot com> <562A578E dot 4080907 at codesourcery dot com> <20151026183422 dot GW478 at tucnak dot redhat dot com>
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 19:34:22 +0100
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> Your use_device sounds very similar to use_device_ptr clause in
> OpenMP, which is allowed on #pragma omp target data construct and is
> implemented quite a bit differently from this; it is unclear if the
> OpenACC standard requires this kind of implementation, or you just
> chose to implement it this way. In particular, the GOMP_target_data
> call puts the variables mentioned in the use_device_ptr clauses into
> the mapping structures (similarly how map clause appears) and the
> corresponding vars are privatized within the target data region
> (which is a host region, basically a fancy { } braces), where the
> private variables contain the offloading device's pointers.
As the author of the original patch, I have to say using the mapping
structures seems like a far better approach, but I've hit some trouble
with the details of adapting OpenACC to use that method.
Firstly, on trunk at least, use_device_ptr variables are restricted to
pointer or array types: that restriction doesn't exist in OpenACC, nor
actually could I find it in the OpenMP 4.1 document (my guess is the
standards are supposed to match in this regard). I think that a program
such as this should work:
void target_fn (int *targ_data);
int
main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
char out;
int myvar;
#pragma omp target enter data map(to: myvar)
#pragma omp target data use_device_ptr(myvar) map(from:out)
{
target_fn (&myvar);
out = 5;
}
return 0;
}
"myvar" would have its address taken in the use_device_ptr region, and
places where the corresponding mapped variable has its address taken
would be replaced by a direct use of the mapped pointer. (Or is that
not a well-formed thing to do, in general?). This fails with "error:
'use_device_ptr' variable is neither a pointer nor an array".
Secondly, attempts to use use_device_ptr on (e.g.
dynamically-allocated) arrays accessed through a pointer cause an ICE
with the existing trunk OpenMP code:
#include <stdlib.h>
void target_fn (char *targ_data);
int
main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
char *myarr, out;
myarr = malloc (1024);
#pragma omp target data map(to: myarr[0:1024])
{
#pragma omp target data use_device_ptr(myarr) map(from:out)
{
target_fn (myarr);
out = 5;
}
}
return 0;
}
udp3.c: In function 'main':
udp3.c:6:1: internal compiler error: in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1298
main (int argc, char *argv[])
^
0x111256b make_decl_rtl(tree_node*)
/scratch/jbrown/openacc-trunk/src/gcc-mainline/gcc/varasm.c:1294
0x9ea005 expand_expr_real_1(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode, expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
/scratch/jbrown/openacc-trunk/src/gcc-mainline/gcc/expr.c:9559
0x9e31c2 expand_expr_real(tree_node*, rtx_def*, machine_mode, expand_modifier, rtx_def**, bool)
/scratch/jbrown/openacc-trunk/src/gcc-mainline/gcc/expr.c:7892
0x9cb4ae expand_expr
/scratch/jbrown/openacc-trunk/src/gcc-mainline/gcc/expr.h:255
0x9d907d expand_assignment(tree_node*, tree_node*, bool)
/scratch/jbrown/openacc-trunk/src/gcc-mainline/gcc/expr.c:5089
0x89e219 expand_gimple_stmt_1
/scratch/jbrown/openacc-trunk/src/gcc-mainline/gcc/cfgexpand.c:3576
0x89e60d expand_gimple_stmt
/scratch/jbrown/openacc-trunk/src/gcc-mainline/gcc/cfgexpand.c:3672
0x8a5773 expand_gimple_basic_block
/scratch/jbrown/openacc-trunk/src/gcc-mainline/gcc/cfgexpand.c:5676
0x8a72d4 execute
/scratch/jbrown/openacc-trunk/src/gcc-mainline/gcc/cfgexpand.c:6288
Furthermore, this looks strange to me (006t.omplower):
.omp_data_arr.5.out = &out;
myarr.8 = myarr;
.omp_data_arr.5.myarr = myarr.8;
#pragma omp target data map(from:out [len: 1]) use_device_ptr(myarr)
{
D.2436 = .omp_data_arr.5.myarr;
myarr = D.2436;
That's clobbering the original myarr variable, right?
Any clues on these two? The omp-low.c code is rather opaque to me...
Thanks,
Julian