This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, VECTOR ABI] Add __attribute__((__simd__)) to GCC.


On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 05:33:32PM +0300, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> --- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi
> +++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
> @@ -3066,6 +3066,20 @@ This function attribute make a stack protection of the function if
>  flags @option{fstack-protector} or @option{fstack-protector-strong}
>  or @option{fstack-protector-explicit} are set.
>  
> +@item simd
> +@cindex @code{simd} function attribute.
> +This attribute enables creation of one or more function versions that
> +can process multiple arguments using SIMD instructions from a
> +single invocation.  Specifying this attribute allows compiler to
> +assume that such a versions are available at link time (provided
> +in the same or another translation unit).  Generated versions are
> +target dependent and described in corresponding Vector ABI document.  For
> +x86_64 target this document can be found
> +@w{@uref{https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/libmvec?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=VectorABI.txt,here}}.
> +It is prohibited to use the attribute along with Cilk Plus's @code{vector}
> +attribute. If the attribute is specified and @code{#pragma omp declare simd}
> +presented on a declaration, then the attribute is ignored.

Is that what is implemented?  I mean, isn't the argument ignored only
if #pragma omp declare simd is present and -fopenmp or -fopenmp-simd
passed on the command line, because otherwise the pragma is ignored?

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]