This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 1/3] [ARM] PR63870 Add qualifiers for NEON builtins


On 07/10/15 00:59, charles.baylis@linaro.org wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c b/gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c
...
              case NEON_ARG_MEMORY:
  	      /* Check if expand failed.  */
  	      if (op[argc] == const0_rtx)
  	      {
-		va_end (ap);
  		return 0;
  	      }

...and drop the braces?

diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
index 02f5dc3..448cde3 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
@@ -30117,4 +30117,5 @@ arm_sched_fusion_priority (rtx_insn *insn, int max_pri,
    *pri = tmp;
    return;
  }
+
  #include "gt-arm.h"

This looks unrelated (and is the only change to arm.c) - perhaps commit separately? (Note I am not a maintainer! But this looks "obvious"...)

diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h b/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
index 87c9f90..27ac4dc 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
@@ -288,6 +288,9 @@ extern void (*arm_lang_output_object_attributes_hook)(void);
  #define TARGET_BPABI false
  #endif

+#define ENDIAN_LANE_N(mode, n)  \
+  (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN ? GET_MODE_NUNITS (mode) - 1 - n : n)
+

Given we are making changes here to how this all works on bigendian, have you tested armeb at all?

Generally I would say this all looks sensible :)

Cheers, Alan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]